Roots of the Sixty Colonists
http://www8.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/html/sixty.html
F.L.Weis collected a set of lines from sixty colonists, who came from
New England between 1623 and 1650. These lines are entries into the
world of higher nobility of Europe.
The colonists are:
Robert Abell
Samuel Appleton
John Barcley
Joseph Bowles
Wymond Bradbury
Obdiah Bruen
Elizabeth Bulkeley
Frances Bulkeley
Martha Bulkeley
Peter Bulkeley
George Burroughs
Edward Carleton
Francis Champernoun
Charles Chauncey
Grace Chetwode
Jeremy Clark
Elizabeth Coytemore
George Curwen
Katherine Deighton
John Drake
Thomas Dudley
Arbella Fiennes
Sarah Fiennes
Alice Freeman
Thomas Gordon
Muriel Gurdon
Mary Gye
Agnes Harris
Thomas James
Mary Launce
Richard Lee
Rosamund Lister
Nathaniel Littleton
Roger Ludlow
Sarah Ludlow
Simon Lynde
Agnes Mackworth
Oliver Mainwaring
Anne Marbury
Elizabeth Marshall
Peter Maverick
Samuel Myles
Thomas Newberry
Ellen Newton
John Oxenbridge
Richard Palgrave
Herbert Pelham
Penelope Pelham
James Prescott
John Prescott
Edward Rigby
Richard Saltonstall
Edward Southworth
Alice Standish
Pardon Tillinghast
Alice Tomes
William Torrey
Margaret Tyndal
John Washbourne
Bridget Yong
Olive Welby
Samuel Whiting
Margaret Wyatt
If you want to search in the data base of colonists
If there are problems, contact me:Herbert Stoyan
Roots of the Sixty Colonists
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
Re: Roots of the Sixty Colonists (etc.)
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:34:52 -0500, Nathaniel Taylor
<[email protected]> wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
Outdated page !!!
# "Genealogical Dictionary of our Origins" (French Canadian site)
# http://www.cam.org/~beaur/dgo/intro-e.html
I changed my address circa 1999, 9 years ago !!!
Replaced by a database available now from
http://www.francogene.com/gfna/gfna/998/index.htm
Home page
http://www.francogene.com/gfna/gfna/998/qrd30.htm
(Quebec Royal Descent list, now over 40 royal lines)
There is a lot of missing links, including for example
genealogics and some French sites, books.google.com,
Gallica, etc.
Same comment (indeed, it is a previous version of the same list).
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard -
/\/ Les Français d'Amérique du Nord - http://www.francogene.com/genealogie--quebec/
|\ French in North America before 1722 - http://www.francogene.com/quebec--genealogy/
/ | Maintenant sur cédérom, début à 1770 (Version 2008)
oo oo Now on CD-ROM, beginnings to 1770 (2008 Release)
<[email protected]> wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
The stuff in Aaron's recent posts, that is Stoyan's db at
Erlangen-Nurnberg, and Tompsett's db at Hull, is already linked in the
FAQ for this newsgroup / mail list --
http://users.erols.com/wrei/faqs/medieval.html
Outdated page !!!
# "Genealogical Dictionary of our Origins" (French Canadian site)
# http://www.cam.org/~beaur/dgo/intro-e.html
I changed my address circa 1999, 9 years ago !!!
Replaced by a database available now from
http://www.francogene.com/gfna/gfna/998/index.htm
Home page
http://www.francogene.com/gfna/gfna/998/qrd30.htm
(Quebec Royal Descent list, now over 40 royal lines)
There is a lot of missing links, including for example
genealogics and some French sites, books.google.com,
Gallica, etc.
I see this version of the FAQ was last updated eight years ago (!).
There is a shorter, older version of the same document, last updated ten
years ago (!) at:
http://www.rootsweb.com/%7Emedieval/faq.htm
Same comment (indeed, it is a previous version of the same list).
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard -
/\/ Les Français d'Amérique du Nord - http://www.francogene.com/genealogie--quebec/
|\ French in North America before 1722 - http://www.francogene.com/quebec--genealogy/
/ | Maintenant sur cédérom, début à 1770 (Version 2008)
oo oo Now on CD-ROM, beginnings to 1770 (2008 Release)
Re: Roots of the Sixty Colonists (etc.)
On Feb 1, 10:37 am, Denis Beauregard <denis.b-at-
[email protected]> wrote:
well, I noticed that he has some stuff right
that Leo has wrong, and I posted that two wives
of royal descent lines in Leo's data disagrees
with Nat Taylor
aaron
[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:34:52 -0500, Nathaniel Taylor
[email protected]> wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
The stuff in Aaron's recent posts, that is Stoyan's db at
Erlangen-Nurnberg, and Tompsett's db at Hull, is already linked in the
FAQ for this newsgroup / mail list --
http://users.erols.com/wrei/faqs/medieval.html
Outdated page !!!
# "Genealogical Dictionary of our Origins" (French Canadian site)
#http://www.cam.org/~beaur/dgo/intro-e.html
I changed my address circa 1999, 9 years ago !!!
Replaced by a database available now from
http://www.francogene.com/gfna/gfna/998/index.htm
Home page
http://www.francogene.com/gfna/gfna/998/qrd30.htm
(Quebec Royal Descent list, now over 40 royal lines)
There is a lot of missing links, including for example
genealogics and some French sites, books.google.com,
Gallica, etc.
I see this version of the FAQ was last updated eight years ago (!).
There is a shorter, older version of the same document, last updated ten
years ago (!) at:
http://www.rootsweb.com/%7Emedieval/faq.htm
Same comment (indeed, it is a previous version of the same list).
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard -
/\/ Les Français d'Amérique du Nord -www.francogene.com/genealogie--quebec/
|\ French in North America before 1722 -www.francogene.com/quebec--genealogy/
/ | Maintenant sur cédérom, début à 1770 (Version 2008)
oo oo Now on CD-ROM, beginnings to 1770 (2008 Release)
well, I noticed that he has some stuff right
that Leo has wrong, and I posted that two wives
of royal descent lines in Leo's data disagrees
with Nat Taylor
aaron
Re: Roots of the Sixty Colonists (etc.)
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: Roots of the Sixty Colonists (etc.)
<snip>
well, I noticed that he has some stuff right
that Leo has wrong, and I posted that two wives
of royal descent lines in Leo's data disagrees
with Nat Taylor
aaron
Dear Aaron,
The person who does not make mistakes, usually doesn't do very much. You
mentioned that my information disagrees with Nat Taylor. Just saying that
does not fix anything. I sent my reasons to gen-med and, if I remember
correctly, nobody disagreed. I even seem to remember, I may be wrong, that
Nat Taylor responded saying he was not sure.
On a daily basis I add and correct information on my website. Such
corrections and additions are most welcome. But no-one can expect me to jump
just because they say "my data disagrees with Nat Taylor". Give me a source
and I will jump even higher than you would want me to..
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas,
Canberra, Australia
From: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: Roots of the Sixty Colonists (etc.)
<snip>
well, I noticed that he has some stuff right
that Leo has wrong, and I posted that two wives
of royal descent lines in Leo's data disagrees
with Nat Taylor
aaron
Dear Aaron,
The person who does not make mistakes, usually doesn't do very much. You
mentioned that my information disagrees with Nat Taylor. Just saying that
does not fix anything. I sent my reasons to gen-med and, if I remember
correctly, nobody disagreed. I even seem to remember, I may be wrong, that
Nat Taylor responded saying he was not sure.
On a daily basis I add and correct information on my website. Such
corrections and additions are most welcome. But no-one can expect me to jump
just because they say "my data disagrees with Nat Taylor". Give me a source
and I will jump even higher than you would want me to..
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas,
Canberra, Australia