Marjory/Marcellina.
Go to my website and double check.
I am not defensive because I want to stick to the information I have, I am
defensive because you seem to want me to jump because you "say so". I am not
interested in Peerage com or whatever. If you want me to change, quote a
primary or secondary source. Websites, for me, do not have a look in. UNLESS
a website quotes primary or secondary sources, but I am not prepared to go
on a wild goose chase because you want me to. If you come up with acceptable
primary or secondary sources, I gladly change my information.
Have you seen Nat Taylor's latest remarks on this?
You have about three times in different messages maintained I am wrong and
should change my website. I do not know how many times by now I have asked
you : produce acceptable sources, if you can't give up on your crusade.
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: Every English monarch down to Queen Elizabeth II is a
descendant of William the Conqueror
On Feb 3, 2:34 pm, "Leo van de Pas" <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Aaron,
You are confusing me, not that this is very difficult.
You say that I have the wrong mother for Lady Marjory (Marcellina) Stewart
and that I have quoted the website of Nathaniel Taylor.What has one got to
do with the other? I have not quoted Nat Taylor with Lady
Marjory/Marcellina's information.
In other words both Nat and I have come to a different conclusion based on
different sources. How do we know who is correct? By looking at primary or
perhaps secondary sources. Other websites may quote those primary or
secondary sources, but if you think I should change my information (why
don't you want Nat Taylor to change his information ?) then YOU have to
supply those more convincing sources. Do you think it is fair of you to
send
me (or Nat Taylor) on a wild goose chase, just because YOU think something
is wrong. You should not THINK something is wrong, you should KNOW. At the
moment Nat and I have differing information but we do not know WHO has it
wrong.
John Ravilious a short while back has sent a message that for a period he
is
snowed under with work, and has no time for genealogy. Pity for you.
Perhaps
he can shine a "final" light on the problem. But as is, I do not see why
either Nat Taylor or I should change our information, just because you
THINK
something is wrong. Supply acceptable sources and I bet either or both
gladly will improve the information we have.
Leo, I do not know why you are defensive about this. You are the one
who
cites Nat Taylor as a source of this info, then you offer a different
wife than
Nat has on his website. That seems to me to then not be the source of
your
info? Why not put his info, or at least cite the source of yours?
Peerage.com
has sources, and I supplied that.
aaron
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1257 - Release Date: 2/3/2008
5:49 PM