Breeding Errors smack down Natural Selection in Evolutionary

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
V. Chris and Tom Tinney,

Breeding Errors smack down Natural Selection in Evolutionary

Legg inn av V. Chris and Tom Tinney, » 12 jun 2007 19:05:13

Breeding Errors smack down Natural Selection in Evolutionary Theories

I note: [Columella, a respected Roman scholar and writer
of the first Century A.D., was a very prolific writer on the topic
of animal care and breeding. He recorded and used the term
“veterinarius” for a person who is a caretaker of pigs, sheep
and cattle. (It is interesting to note that the word veterina
was the Roman word for “pack animals”. In Rome the term
"souvetaurinarii" was another word that was used for someone
who took care of animals.) Between 42-68 A.D., Columella
wrote 12 volumes of animal-related publications on topics such
as animal breeding, husbandry, and health in livestock. His works
include descriptions of disease, and medication formulae that were
used up into the Middle Ages.]
http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/VetHi ... istory.htm
http://wahvm.vet.uu.nl/specific/resourc ... eriod.html

Breeding appears to have been around for thousands of years.
"But because genes are often tied to multiple traits, scientists
warn, deliberate selection of certain ones can backfire. The gene
responsible for those silver-coated Labradors, for example,
is tied to skin problems."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/12/scien ... oo&emc=rss

Biblical statements concerning the earth being corrupt,
with all flesh upon the earth being corrupted, are mentioned
during the time of the Patriarch Noah, 2944 to 1994 B.C.
There were giants on the earth in those days that attempted
to take away the life of Noah, indicating from Holy Scripture,
the time frame for the worldwide culmination of the development
and mutation of dinosaurs, plants and other distorted, abnormally
deformed creatures.
http://academic-genealogy.com/ancientan ... logies.htm

DNA evidence cannot "prove" exact pedigree genealogy connections.
Carefully note: "DNA evidence, combined with other non-controversial
historical evidence, recently brought to closure the long-suspected
relationship between Thomas Jefferson, or his brother, and Sally
Hemmings." (This should be stated as reasonably connected to
the Jefferson family DNA). Neither can Evolution be "proved" to be
more or less than individual personal speculations and broad based
assumptions, a so called "scientific" mythological family tree, not
grounded in exact factual reality.

Carefully note the assumptions: "A few generations of human
evolutionary change is but a blink of an eye compared to what
has gone before. It might take 25,000-50,000 generations --
a half million to a million years or more – for really significant
change to occur." Note: "might take". Nevertheless, "scientific"
culture believes this to be true, and they use the supernatural
to interpret natural events and to explain the nature of the universe
and humanity; i.e., they cannot be explained from actual laws
and current species living and a part of the observed natural world.
There is no greater lesson taught: nature's reproducing processes
- the day to day creations in trillions, of "after their own kind".
http://darwiniana.org/intro1.htm

Respectfully yours,

Tom Tinney, Sr.
Who's Who in America,
Millennium Edition [54th] through 2004
Who's Who In Genealogy and Heraldry,
[both editions]
Family Genealogy & History
Internet Education Directory
http://www.academic-genealogy.com/

Svar

Gå tilbake til «alt.genealogy»