"I told you - and the newsgroup - that I had fallen from a motorbike and
hit my head on a cobblestone, acquiring a brain impairment."
Peter Stewart -- 1 December 2004, 0250 GMT
"I have openly acknowledged to SGM, without prompting from nuisnaces,
[sic] my having an acquired brain impairment."
Peter Stewart -- 1 December 2004, 0344 GMT
-----------Cordon Sanitaire------------------
Bingo!
Quite True!
A serious person with a clear-minded, functioning, UNIMPAIRED brain
quite obviously would NEVER write something so foolish, silly-buggers
and obtuse as THIS:
-------Cordon Sanitaire---------------
"A question of course is a kind of suggestion, since if it can't be
answered in the positive it would not be posed in the first place:..."
Peter Stewart -- 30 November 2004, 0715 GMT
-------Cordon Sanitaire----------------
It DOES take someone with a BRAIN IMPAIRMENT a truly BOLLIXED BRAIN,
such as Peter Stewart, to write -- and then POST that sort of risible
GIBBERISH.
But:
GREAT ENTERTAINMENT!
This is why Kings liked Fools at Court -- for Entertainment -- and if
the fools were a bit brain-damaged, with bollixed brains -- so much the
better -- that often made them funnier.
Peter Stewart makes an EXCELLENT Fool.
Enjoy!
Tally Ho!
"The final happiness of man consists in the contemplation of truth....
This is sought for its own sake, and is directed to no other end beyond
itself." Saint Thomas Aquinas, [1224/5-1274] "Summa Contra Gentiles"
[c.1258-1264]
"Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur. Odi profanum vulgus et arceo."
Quintus Aurelius Stultus [33 B.C. - 42 A.D.]
Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
opus.
'Nuff Said.
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Peter Stewart's Bollixed Brain
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
-
Peter Stewart
Re: Peter Stewart's Bollixed Brain
D. Spencer Hines wrote:
<snip>
So try to refute it, Spencer - you are getting nowhere trying to mock it.
You are flailing around but failing to connect.
It's a comic spectacle, although not "great" entertainment.
Your lies and distortions are demonstrated. Your opinions are, quite
miserably, not.
Peter Stewart
<snip>
A serious person with a clear-minded, functioning, UNIMPAIRED brain
quite obviously would NEVER write something so foolish, silly-buggers
and obtuse as THIS:
-------Cordon Sanitaire---------------
"A question of course is a kind of suggestion, since if it can't be
answered in the positive it would not be posed in the first place:..."
Peter Stewart -- 30 November 2004, 0715 GMT
-------Cordon Sanitaire----------------
It DOES take someone with a BRAIN IMPAIRMENT a truly BOLLIXED BRAIN,
such as Peter Stewart, to write -- and then POST that sort of risible
GIBBERISH.
So try to refute it, Spencer - you are getting nowhere trying to mock it.
You are flailing around but failing to connect.
It's a comic spectacle, although not "great" entertainment.
Your lies and distortions are demonstrated. Your opinions are, quite
miserably, not.
Peter Stewart
-
Peter Stewart
Re: Peter Stewart's Bollixed Brain
D. Spencer Hines wrote:
<snip>
With a thief it may be that "it takes one to know one", but with
Spencer's kind of problem it clearly takes one to fantasise another.
As to GIBBERISH, he has still not begun to explain why it is that he
asked if a dayne could "conceivably" be equal to around 120 acres just
33 minutes after himself posting crystal-clear evidence that it could
not "conceivably" be so.
His purported conceptual skills are the platform from which he gibbers
at other people in this newsgroup, as in his latest extremely silly
sallies at myself and Gordon Hale. But when these alleged skills come
under examination, they prove to be illusory, a foul hole containing
noisome waste. An intellectual dayne, full of dung.
Gentle SGM readers are not fooled.
Peter Stewart
<snip>
It DOES take someone with a BRAIN IMPAIRMENT a truly BOLLIXED BRAIN,
such as Peter Stewart, to write -- and then POST that sort of risible
GIBBERISH.
With a thief it may be that "it takes one to know one", but with
Spencer's kind of problem it clearly takes one to fantasise another.
As to GIBBERISH, he has still not begun to explain why it is that he
asked if a dayne could "conceivably" be equal to around 120 acres just
33 minutes after himself posting crystal-clear evidence that it could
not "conceivably" be so.
His purported conceptual skills are the platform from which he gibbers
at other people in this newsgroup, as in his latest extremely silly
sallies at myself and Gordon Hale. But when these alleged skills come
under examination, they prove to be illusory, a foul hole containing
noisome waste. An intellectual dayne, full of dung.
Gentle SGM readers are not fooled.
Peter Stewart
-
Matthew Rockefeller
Re: Peter Stewart's Bollixed Brain
"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ACprd.440$LL3.6016@eagle.america.net>...
My question Spencer is whether or not Hale and Jhonson were on the
motorbike with him. Jhonson has more than a brain impairment though,
more like a brain and personality impairment. It's gotten to the point
where I'm reading only about half of his posts, because I can't read
them without getting angry at the blatant and obvious ignorance. He
clearly doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time. He
also clearly only "researchs" something after it is aforementioned by
the group, then tries to come off a know-it-all. I don't think he ever
does any research of his own right or ever contributes to the
newsgroup on a genealogical basis, but he sure doesn't mind throwing
his opinion around. I'm tired of him questioning everything. I have
received a handful of emails from others agreeing with me that they
have received rude or just plain dumb emails from him.
Now Gordon Hale on the other hand doesn't make as much of a fool of
himself on the group, whereas he has emailed me with his agenda and I
have not responded but for the first time, because frankly I don't
have the patience to deal with it.
Now he has the nerve, while all the time contributing nothing, to
question not on WAR's scholarly ability but that of other professional
genealogist as well who actually took the time to check the records
and discover the Senator's descent. It's gotten out of hand and I'm
washing my hands of it.
But I agree Hines, let them entertain us.
Matthew
"I told you - and the newsgroup - that I had fallen from a motorbike and
hit my head on a cobblestone, acquiring a brain impairment."
Peter Stewart -- 1 December 2004, 0250 GMT
My question Spencer is whether or not Hale and Jhonson were on the
motorbike with him. Jhonson has more than a brain impairment though,
more like a brain and personality impairment. It's gotten to the point
where I'm reading only about half of his posts, because I can't read
them without getting angry at the blatant and obvious ignorance. He
clearly doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time. He
also clearly only "researchs" something after it is aforementioned by
the group, then tries to come off a know-it-all. I don't think he ever
does any research of his own right or ever contributes to the
newsgroup on a genealogical basis, but he sure doesn't mind throwing
his opinion around. I'm tired of him questioning everything. I have
received a handful of emails from others agreeing with me that they
have received rude or just plain dumb emails from him.
Now Gordon Hale on the other hand doesn't make as much of a fool of
himself on the group, whereas he has emailed me with his agenda and I
have not responded but for the first time, because frankly I don't
have the patience to deal with it.
Now he has the nerve, while all the time contributing nothing, to
question not on WAR's scholarly ability but that of other professional
genealogist as well who actually took the time to check the records
and discover the Senator's descent. It's gotten out of hand and I'm
washing my hands of it.
But I agree Hines, let them entertain us.
Matthew
-
D. Spencer Hines
Re: Peter Stewart's Bollixed Brain
D'accord.
According to Stewart himself, it was Peter Stewart's GIRLFRIEND of the
day who was on the motorbike -- and steering. So I doubt there was room
for Hale and Jhonson.
Bad choice on Peter's part to get on too -- and especially while drunk.
He insists on "TIPSY." Hilarious!
But we all know college students WILL do stupid, amusing things -- and
Oxford students are certainly not exempt.
I wonder if he dumped HER after the accident or she dumped HIM [for the
second time] -- as damaged goods.
How do you relate to John D. Rockefeller, Sr., if at all?
Cheers,
DSH
"Matthew Rockefeller" <matthew_rockefeller@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1623fca6.0412012035.3a660aa4@posting.google.com...
| "D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<ACprd.440$LL3.6016@eagle.america.net>...
| > "I told you - and the newsgroup - that I had fallen from a motorbike
and
| > hit my head on a cobblestone, acquiring a brain impairment."
| >
| > Peter Stewart -- 1 December 2004, 0250 GMT
|
| My question Spencer is whether or not Hale and Jhonson were on the
| motorbike with him. Jhonson has more than a brain impairment though,
| more like a brain and personality impairment. It's gotten to the point
| where I'm reading only about half of his posts, because I can't read
| them without getting angry at the blatant and obvious ignorance. He
| clearly doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time. He
| also clearly only "researchs" something after it is aforementioned by
| the group, then tries to come off a know-it-all. I don't think he ever
| does any research of his own right or ever contributes to the
| newsgroup on a genealogical basis, but he sure doesn't mind throwing
| his opinion around. I'm tired of him questioning everything. I have
| received a handful of emails from others agreeing with me that they
| have received rude or just plain dumb emails from him.
|
| Now Gordon Hale on the other hand doesn't make as much of a fool of
| himself on the group, whereas he has emailed me with his agenda and I
| have not responded but for the first time, because frankly I don't
| have the patience to deal with it.
|
| Now he has the nerve, while all the time contributing nothing, to
| question not on WAR's scholarly ability but that of other professional
| genealogist as well who actually took the time to check the records
| and discover the Senator's descent. It's gotten out of hand and I'm
| washing my hands of it.
|
| But I agree Hines, let them entertain us.
|
| Matthew
According to Stewart himself, it was Peter Stewart's GIRLFRIEND of the
day who was on the motorbike -- and steering. So I doubt there was room
for Hale and Jhonson.
Bad choice on Peter's part to get on too -- and especially while drunk.
He insists on "TIPSY." Hilarious!
But we all know college students WILL do stupid, amusing things -- and
Oxford students are certainly not exempt.
I wonder if he dumped HER after the accident or she dumped HIM [for the
second time] -- as damaged goods.
How do you relate to John D. Rockefeller, Sr., if at all?
Cheers,
DSH
"Matthew Rockefeller" <matthew_rockefeller@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1623fca6.0412012035.3a660aa4@posting.google.com...
| "D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<ACprd.440$LL3.6016@eagle.america.net>...
| > "I told you - and the newsgroup - that I had fallen from a motorbike
and
| > hit my head on a cobblestone, acquiring a brain impairment."
| >
| > Peter Stewart -- 1 December 2004, 0250 GMT
|
| My question Spencer is whether or not Hale and Jhonson were on the
| motorbike with him. Jhonson has more than a brain impairment though,
| more like a brain and personality impairment. It's gotten to the point
| where I'm reading only about half of his posts, because I can't read
| them without getting angry at the blatant and obvious ignorance. He
| clearly doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time. He
| also clearly only "researchs" something after it is aforementioned by
| the group, then tries to come off a know-it-all. I don't think he ever
| does any research of his own right or ever contributes to the
| newsgroup on a genealogical basis, but he sure doesn't mind throwing
| his opinion around. I'm tired of him questioning everything. I have
| received a handful of emails from others agreeing with me that they
| have received rude or just plain dumb emails from him.
|
| Now Gordon Hale on the other hand doesn't make as much of a fool of
| himself on the group, whereas he has emailed me with his agenda and I
| have not responded but for the first time, because frankly I don't
| have the patience to deal with it.
|
| Now he has the nerve, while all the time contributing nothing, to
| question not on WAR's scholarly ability but that of other professional
| genealogist as well who actually took the time to check the records
| and discover the Senator's descent. It's gotten out of hand and I'm
| washing my hands of it.
|
| But I agree Hines, let them entertain us.
|
| Matthew