Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Gjest

Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Gjest » 30. desember 2007 kl. 5.16

Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'. He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.

I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

This includes a page looking at his genealogy, because (of course) he
has been telling anyone who'll listen that he's the heir of the
Stanley family. [Guess what? He isn't].

He's not terribly big on 'evidence' but he does have an online
pedigree, citing 'Richardson, Douglas, Plantagent Ancestry, Baltimore,
2004.' to back up his claims :-)

If anyone feels like having a look at the pedigree page (which extends
back to Thomas, 1st Earl of Derby d 1504) and commenting on my
sources, statements or conclusions, I would welcome the same.

I have come across some other interesting and on-topic bits and pieces
which I shall try to post shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

[email protected]

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av [email protected] » 30. desember 2007 kl. 5.31

Good work Michael.

Doug Smith

[email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'. He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.

I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

This includes a page looking at his genealogy, because (of course) he
has been telling anyone who'll listen that he's the heir of the
Stanley family. [Guess what? He isn't].

He's not terribly big on 'evidence' but he does have an online
pedigree, citing 'Richardson, Douglas, Plantagent Ancestry, Baltimore,
2004.' to back up his claims :-)

If anyone feels like having a look at the pedigree page (which extends
back to Thomas, 1st Earl of Derby d 1504) and commenting on my
sources, statements or conclusions, I would welcome the same.

I have come across some other interesting and on-topic bits and pieces
which I shall try to post shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

AdrianBnjmBurke

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av AdrianBnjmBurke » 30. desember 2007 kl. 18.45

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.

I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

This includes a page looking at his genealogy, because (of course) he
has been telling anyone who'll listen that he's the heir of the
Stanley family.  [Guess what?  He isn't].

He's not terribly big on 'evidence' but he does have an online
pedigree, citing 'Richardson, Douglas, Plantagent Ancestry, Baltimore,
2004.' to back up his claims :-)

If anyone feels like having a look at the pedigree page (which extends
back to Thomas, 1st Earl of Derby d 1504) and commenting on my
sources, statements or conclusions, I would welcome the same.

I have come across some other interesting and on-topic bits and pieces
which I shall try to post shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church.....

Gjest

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Gjest » 30. desember 2007 kl. 21.02

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:





Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.

I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

This includes a page looking at his genealogy, because (of course) he
has been telling anyone who'll listen that he's the heir of the
Stanley family.  [Guess what?  He isn't].

He's not terribly big on 'evidence' but he does have an online
pedigree, citing 'Richardson, Douglas, Plantagent Ancestry, Baltimore,
2004.' to back up his claims :-)

If anyone feels like having a look at the pedigree page (which extends
back to Thomas, 1st Earl of Derby d 1504) and commenting on my
sources, statements or conclusions, I would welcome the same.

I have come across some other interesting and on-topic bits and pieces
which I shall try to post shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church.....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

AdrianBnjmBurke

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av AdrianBnjmBurke » 30. desember 2007 kl. 22.07

On Dec 30, 2:46 pm, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:





On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:

Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.

I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

This includes a page looking at his genealogy, because (of course) he
has been telling anyone who'll listen that he's the heir of the
Stanley family.  [Guess what?  He isn't].

He's not terribly big on 'evidence' but he does have an online
pedigree, citing 'Richardson, Douglas, Plantagent Ancestry, Baltimore,
2004.' to back up his claims :-)

If anyone feels like having a look at the pedigree page (which extends
back to Thomas, 1st Earl of Derby d 1504) and commenting on my
sources, statements or conclusions, I would welcome the same.

I have come across some other interesting and on-topic bits and pieces
which I shall try to post shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church.....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!

[email protected]

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av [email protected] » 30. desember 2007 kl. 22.12

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church.....- Hide quoted text -

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbing Ancestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval

AdrianBnjmBurke

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av AdrianBnjmBurke » 30. desember 2007 kl. 22.13

On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]





On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church.....- Hide quoted text -

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbingAncestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

D. Spencer Hines

Re: Pedigree Of The Early Kings Of Man

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 30. desember 2007 kl. 22.26

Then there are the CHRISTIAN Deemsters of Man -- an interesting lineage.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:dbe872fc-353a-43e9-b8cd-d4de6f6aebcc@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...

Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'. He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.

I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

This includes a page looking at his genealogy, because (of course) he
has been telling anyone who'll listen that he's the heir of the
Stanley family. [Guess what? He isn't].

He's not terribly big on 'evidence' but he does have an online
pedigree, citing 'Richardson, Douglas, Plantagent Ancestry, Baltimore,
2004.' to back up his claims :-)

If anyone feels like having a look at the pedigree page (which extends
back to Thomas, 1st Earl of Derby d 1504) and commenting on my
sources, statements or conclusions, I would welcome the same.

I have come across some other interesting and on-topic bits and pieces
which I shall try to post shortly.

Kind regards, Michael

Gjest

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Gjest » 31. desember 2007 kl. 0.42

On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:





From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne


- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas. If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R

AdrianBnjmBurke

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av AdrianBnjmBurke » 31. desember 2007 kl. 1.50

On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:





On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas.  If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh: his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?

Nathaniel Taylor

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Nathaniel Taylor » 31. desember 2007 kl. 3.24

In article
<e487121a-fc2e-41f5-803c-11e7de20b704@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[email protected] wrote:

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas. If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Well, Douglas Richardson's books _Plantagenet Ancestry_ and _Magna Carta
Ancestry_ do have a sketch of the descent of William Bladen of Maryland
from Thomas Stanley, 1st Earl of Derby (which I have no reason to
believe is controversial; and it is true that Bladen is the only
American colonist treated in Richardson's books who descends from that
interesting person). Of course this does not imply Richardson's
endorsement of any other aspect of Howe's alleged genealogy or claims.

Nat Taylor
http://www.nltaylor.net

Gjest

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Gjest » 31. desember 2007 kl. 3.57

On Dec 31, 1:24 pm, Nathaniel Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
In article
e487121a-fc2e-41f5-803c-11e7de20b...@i1 ... groups.com>,

 [email protected] wrote:
The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas.  If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Well, Douglas Richardson's books _Plantagenet Ancestry_ and _Magna Carta
Ancestry_ do have a sketch of the descent of William Bladen of Maryland
from Thomas Stanley, 1st Earl of Derby (which I have no reason to
believe is controversial; and it is true that Bladen is the only
American colonist treated in Richardson's books who descends from that
interesting person).  Of course this does not imply Richardson's
endorsement of any other aspect of Howe's alleged genealogy or claims.

Absolutely - but if you have a good name to preserve, it is worth
knowing where it is being bandied about.

MAR

[email protected]

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av [email protected] » 31. desember 2007 kl. 5.16

On Dec 30, 4:12 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'. He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church.....- Hide quoted text -

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbingAncestralDescendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

From: AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:14:51 -0800 (PST)
Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church.....- Hide quoted text -

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbing Ancestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval

LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!

persiflage, persiflage, persiflage

BBC's hour long special, viewed from the land down under, didn't
exactly
have a good track record
for verifying their sources of information either!!!!!!!!!

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbing Ancestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval

Gjest

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Gjest » 31. desember 2007 kl. 7.00

On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:





On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas.  If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...

[email protected]

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av [email protected] » 31. desember 2007 kl. 14.10

On Dec 31, 12:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:



On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas.  If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


exactly - but it's a good a laugh: his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...

LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmmm...

Huck Finn for Am president will change all that,
and bring back HM the Iron Lady of The Faulklands.

Lux

BBC's hour long special, viewed from the land down under, didn't
exactly
have a good track record
for verifying their sources of information either!!!!!!!!!

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne
http://Back-stabbing Ancestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval

AdrianBnjmBurke

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av AdrianBnjmBurke » 31. desember 2007 kl. 18.34

On Dec 31, 8:09 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 31, 12:58 am, [email protected] wrote:





On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas.  If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...
Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...

LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmmm...

Huck Finn for Am president will change all that,
and bring back HM the Iron Lady of The Faulklands.

Lux

BBC's hour long special, viewed from the land down under, didn't
exactly
have a good track record
for verifying their sources of information either!!!!!!!!!

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magnehttp://Back-stabbingAncestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........

Gjest

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Gjest » 1. januar 2008 kl. 7.20

On Dec 31, 9:33 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 31, 8:09 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:





On Dec 31, 12:58 am, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas.  If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...
Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...

LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmmm...

Huck Finn for Am president will change all that,
and bring back HM the Iron Lady of The Faulklands.

Lux

BBC's hour long special, viewed from the land down under, didn't
exactly
have a good track record
for verifying their sources of information either!!!!!!!!!

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magnehttp://Back-stabbingAncestralDescendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are confusing him with our current president.

AdrianBnjmBurke

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av AdrianBnjmBurke » 1. januar 2008 kl. 7.24

On Jan 1, 1:18 am, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 31, 9:33 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:





On Dec 31, 8:09 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 31, 12:58 am, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'.  He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

 <snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas.  If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...
Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh:  his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...

LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmmm...

Huck Finn for Am president will change all that,
and bring back HM the Iron Lady of The Faulklands.

Lux

BBC's hour long special, viewed from the land down under, didn't
exactly
have a good track record
for verifying their sources of information either!!!!!!!!!

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magnehttp://Back-stabbingAncestralDesce ... .medieval- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are confusing him with our current president.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

nah....i think they both fit the bill

Gjest

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av Gjest » 1. januar 2008 kl. 9.04

On Jan 1, 5:18 pm, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 31, 9:33 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

(snip of much OT garbage)

"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........

You are confusing him with our current president.

Er, with respect, wasn't it you complaining about the volume of spam
on this group just the other day?

[email protected]

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av [email protected] » 1. januar 2008 kl. 16.18

On Jan 1, 3:02 am, [email protected] wrote:
On Jan 1, 5:18 pm, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 31, 9:33 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

(snip of much OT garbage)

"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........

You are confusing him with our current president.

Er, with respect, wasn't it you complaining about the volume of spam
on this group just the other day?


From: AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:21:37 -0800 (PST)
References: <dbe872fc-353a-43e9-b8cd-
[email protected]><3d4c3ae3-eb6a-4fce-
[email protected]>
<4938ca42-3655-42b8-94e6-22ebaebc58d1@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>
<b578a6ca-5f7d-4a75-b960-8b2603b5823a@w47g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
<e487121a-fc2e-41f5-803c-11e7de20b704@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>
<d9384a50-3e16-46e6-be55-da5bb107abfd@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>
<56245673-bdf1-475f-ba16-3ac868b2cafa@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>


On Jan 1, 1:18 am, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 31, 9:33 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:





On Dec 31, 8:09 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 31, 12:58 am, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:

On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:

On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]

On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All

As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'. He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:

http://www.unrealroyal.com

snip
Kind regards, Michael

Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church

If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.

Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

- Show quoted text -

really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was

There was no such programme on the BBC.

The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.

So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas. If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.

Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh: his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...
Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.

MA-R

http://www.unrealroyal.com

MA-R- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

exactly - but it's a good a laugh: his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...

LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmmm...

Huck Finn for Am president will change all that,
and bring back HM the Iron Lady of The Faulklands.

Lux

BBC's hour long special, viewed from the land down under, didn't
exactly
have a good track record
for verifying their sources of information either!!!!!!!!!

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magnehttp://Back-stabbingAncestralDesce ... .medieval- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are confusing him with our current president.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

nah....i think they both fit the bill

Hmmmm...

and your contender is? your brother Osama bin MA-R?


~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbing Ancestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval

[email protected]

Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man

Legg inn av [email protected] » 2. januar 2008 kl. 5.16

[email protected]
View profile
More options Jan 1, 10:17 am
On Jan 1, 3:02 am, [email protected] wrote:
On Jan 1, 5:18 pm, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 31, 9:33 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:
(snip of much OT garbage)
"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........
You are confusing him with our current president.
Er, with respect, wasn't it you complaining about the volume of spam
on this group just the other day?


From: AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:21:37 -0800 (PST)
References: <dbe872fc-353a-43e9-b8cd-
[email protected]><3d4c3ae3-eb6a-4fce-
[email protected]>
<4938ca42-3655-42b8-94e6-22ebaebc5...@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>
<b578a6ca-5f7d-4a75-b960-8b2603b58...@w47g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
<e487121a-fc2e-41f5-803c-11e7de20b...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>
<d9384a50-3e16-46e6-be55-da5bb107a...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>
<56245673-bdf1-475f-ba16-3ac868b2c...@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
<[email protected]>
On Jan 1, 1:18 am, [email protected] wrote:
- Hide quoted text -

On Dec 31, 9:33 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:
On Dec 31, 8:09 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:
On Dec 31, 12:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:
On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, [email protected] wrote:
On Dec 31, 8:12 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
wrote:
On Dec 30, 4:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]
wrote:
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 30, 9:11 am, AdrianBnjmBurke <[email protected]
On Dec 29, 10:24 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Dear All
As some of you know, I have been spending a bit of time looking into
the curious case of a chap in Maryland who has set himself up online
as 'King of the Isle of Man'. He also sells "titles of nobility' at
special prices ranging from L30,000 to L90,000.
I have recently set up a website site looking at his claims - and
exposing them for the sham they are:
http://www.unrealroyal.com
snip
Kind regards, Michael
Just visited his website - hilarious that Fox "News" had him on and
treated him like "royalty". I also loved how he states that
"Archbishop" crowned him - with no name or church
If it was on Fox News, it should come as no surprise that it is bogus.
Hmmm...also on BBC, an hour special
~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne
- Show quoted text -
really? i hope the BBC was a bit more tepid in their handling of his
claims than Fox "News" was
There was no such programme on the BBC.
The 'archbishop' is anonymous; the 'barrister' is anonymous; the 'lord
advocate' is anonymous; the 'supporters' are anonymous; the 'English
genealogist' is anonymous; the 'researchers' are anonymous; the
'experts' are anonymous.
So far the only authority actually named is... Douglas. If I were
Douglas I would ask for my name to be withdrawn - having it associated
with scams and fake title sales isn't good publicity.
Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.
MA-R
http://www.unrealroyal.com
MA-R- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
exactly - but it's a good a laugh: his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...
Nevertheless, it amazes me what the press will pick up on during the
silly season.
MA-R
http://www.unrealroyal.com
MA-R- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
exactly - but it's a good a laugh: his brazen medacity especially
when he writes that he was "crowned by archbishop in a secret
undisclosed location in maryland"....perhaps Dick Cheney was the
archibishop who crowned him?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well, given the coverage by Fox, maybe Rush Limbaugh bought an
archbishopric from Universal Life or something. Or maybe from HM of
Man hisself...
LOL...exactly...they don't exactly have a good track record for
verifying their sources of information!!!!!!!!!!
Hmmmm...
Huck Finn for Am president will change all that,
and bring back HM the Iron Lady of The Faulklands.
Lux
BBC's hour long special, viewed from the land down under, didn't
exactly
have a good track record
for verifying their sources of information either!!!!!!!!!
~Bret, scion of Charle de Magnehttp://Back-stabbingAncestralDesce ... .medieval- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
"Huck Finn"??? Are you referring to the christo-fascist southern red
neck white trash wannabe huckleberry? oh lord........- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You are confusing him with our current president.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
nah....i think they both fit the bill


Hmmmm...

and your contender is? your brother Osama bin MA-R?

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbing Ancestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»