Fw: Children of Isabel of England (Died 1241), Wife of Emper

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Fw: Children of Isabel of England (Died 1241), Wife of Emper

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 14 feb 2008 01:22:14

----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Richardson" <royalancestry@msn.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Children of Isabel of England (Died 1241), Wife of Emperor
Frederick II


On Feb 13, 4:38 pm, mj...@btinternet.com wrote:
<snip>

You're right about one thing, though. Crossposting is a choice for
all of us. And, occasionally some of us exercise that option. That's
what free speech is all about, both here on the internet and
elsewhere.
-------------In Rome do as the Romans do. I am sure you can cross yourself
in public in the USA, Australia and many other places, but I suggest you do
not do it in Teheran.

When you go into a church, you can keep your shoes on, but I wouldn't do it
when entereing a mosque.

I hope Richardson is trained well enough to know that. His insistence on
crossposting is simply inspired by spite,
realising he is not the acknowledged as the great white banana he thinks he
is, he resents being told he "just could be wrong" it is bad enough that his
questionable genealogy is scrutinised, and now his aim is to spoil it for
everyone.

Richardson, your best is just not good enough.

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1276 - Release Date: 2/13/2008
9:41 AM

D. Spencer Hines

Re: Children of Isabel of England (Died 1241),Wife of Empero

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 14 feb 2008 02:07:24

Van de Pas and Stewart quite obviously do not understand the American
concept of Free Speech.

They have a very pinch-minded and parochial view of what Free Speech, under
the Rule of Law, is all about.

One is Dutch and the other Australian, so that's understandable.

Further, simulposting is often the best way to get the word out to a larger
audience and encourage a free and lively debate.

Richardson and I do not fear that, whereas Van de Pas and Stewart DO.

They want a cosseted, closeted audience -- fearing exposure of some of their
gross errors and idiocies to a larger audience -- and the conseqent
criticism engendered.

Understood...

But Not Condoned.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

Peter Stewart

Re: Children of Isabel of England (Died 1241),Wife of Empero

Legg inn av Peter Stewart » 14 feb 2008 02:38:25

"D. Spencer Hines" <panther@excelsior.com> wrote in message
news:YAMsj.460$9l1.3421@eagle.america.net...
Van de Pas and Stewart quite obviously do not understand the American
concept of Free Speech.

They have a very pinch-minded and parochial view of what Free Speech,
under the Rule of Law, is all about.

One is Dutch and the other Australian, so that's understandable.

Further, simulposting is often the best way to get the word out to a
larger audience and encourage a free and lively debate.

Richardson and I do not fear that, whereas Van de Pas and Stewart DO.

They want a cosseted, closeted audience -- fearing exposure of some of
their gross errors and idiocies to a larger audience -- and the conseqent
criticism engendered.

"Conseqent"? And we all thought Hines never makes mistakes...

The rest of his post is just the usual pernicious time-wasting rubbish,
trying to give himself the illusion that he is in contact with the world
that has in reality abandoned the ghastly sucker.

Anyone is free to speak with me via SGM, or about me anywhere else for that
matter - but since I don't read any other newsgroups & could not care less
what is said in them, I have no intention of pursuing cross-posted threads
all over Usenet just in case anyone in SHM, alt.british.history or
alt.talk.royalty (in all of which this subject is off-topic anyway) has the
sense not to broadcast a response to all the others.

Peter Stewart

letiTiAflufF@gmail.com

Re: Children of Isabel of England (Died 1241),Wife of Empero

Legg inn av letiTiAflufF@gmail.com » 14 feb 2008 05:22:03

On Feb 13, 8:38 pm, "Peter Stewart" <p_m_stew...@msn.com> wrote:
Anyone is free to speak with me via SGM, or about me anywhere else for that
matter - but since I don't read any other newsgroups & could not care less
what is said in them, I have no intention of pursuing cross-posted threads
all over Usenet just in case anyone in SHM, alt.british.history or
alt.talk.royalty (in all of which this subject is off-topic anyway) has the
sense not to broadcast a response to all the others.

Who are you, HM the Queen? Do you have a Tower of London to lock us
in?
Who appoint you the royal pain in the a$$ of Policeman of SGM anyway?

persiflage, persiflage, persiflage

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

http://Back-stabbing Ancestral Descendants ASSoc.genealogy.medieval

Volucris

Re: Children of Isabel of England (Died 1241),Wife of Empero

Legg inn av Volucris » 14 feb 2008 08:40:03

Yes, and the Dutch gave us liar, liar, pants on fire Van der Sloot

Can't recall he was ever presented to you as a gift. But you're
copying his behaviour. Trying to impress us all with your pooha.
You're just fried air. Next time you look in the mirror say hello to
Aaron. If you're in the neighbourhood of the toilet, don't hold back.
Flush yourself.

Hans

[snip]
persiflage, persiflage, persiflage

~Bret, scion of Charle de Magne

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»