TROLLING FOR THE TROLL

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Bill Arnold

TROLLING FOR THE TROLL

Legg inn av Bill Arnold » 29 nov 2007 05:20:03

Hi, Gen-medievalers :0

If there is one thing a *troll* hates it is to be proved a hypocrite!
The only time The Insipid One posts something about genealogy
is when he is trying to curry favor. Note: The Insipid One has *not*
responded to this post of his and my response to him. Why? I know
why: because he is a hypocrite, a troll with no identity. This post
below is the only time I have ever read where our resident troll
attempts to create an online identity. So: he needs to be baited
with a carcass he cannot eat. You must understand, folks, that
a troll cannot assume a real identity because then s/he will be
vulnerable. Have you never wondered why a troll remains anonymous?
Because they cannot be hurt, whereas they can kill real posters from
their anonymity. Go ahead, O Insipid One, spit out the truth and
certainty of your past, identify yourself to experts at *IDENTITY*:
genealogists!


DSH: Yes, that may well be what he means.
And I may be 1/32nd -- Cherokee.
And proud of it.

BA: But of course, everybody in the south who traces their personal
ancestry back to Colonial Days has a great-great-great-grandmother
who was captured by white traders and she was a full-blood Cherokee,
and this you can *see* because the testator of this unproven information
has high cheekbones. OK: O Insipid One, as you so often rant: PROVE IT!
SOURCES! BIRTH RECORDS, DEATH RECORDS, MARRIAGE RECORDS!!!

Bill

*****



____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Gjest

Re: TROLLING FOR THE TROLL

Legg inn av Gjest » 29 nov 2007 10:20:03

On Nov 29, 5:13 am, Bill Arnold <billarnold...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi, Gen-medievalers :0

If there is one thing a *troll* hates it is to be proved a hypocrite!
The only time The Insipid One posts something about genealogy
is when he is trying to curry favor. Note: The Insipid One has *not*
responded to this post of his and my response to him. Why? I know
why: because he is a hypocrite, a troll with no identity. This post
below is the only time I have ever read where our resident troll
attempts to create an online identity. So: he needs to be baited
with a carcass he cannot eat. You must understand, folks, that
a troll cannot assume a real identity because then s/he will be
vulnerable. Have you never wondered why a troll remains anonymous?
Because they cannot be hurt, whereas they can kill real posters from
their anonymity. Go ahead, O Insipid One, spit out the truth and
certainty of your past, identify yourself to experts at *IDENTITY*:
genealogists!

DSH: Yes, that may well be what he means.
And I may be 1/32nd -- Cherokee.
And proud of it.

BA: But of course, everybody in the south who traces their personal
ancestry back to Colonial Days has a great-great-great-grandmother
who was captured by white traders and she was a full-blood Cherokee,
and this you can *see* because the testator of this unproven information
has high cheekbones. OK: O Insipid One, as you so often rant: PROVE IT!
SOURCES! BIRTH RECORDS, DEATH RECORDS, MARRIAGE RECORDS!!!

Bill

*****

____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

This is the fifth time you have posted this same message, which has
nothing to do with medieval genealogy. If you'd bothered to go through
the archives you'd have found that DSH is far from anonymous - full
naval career, famous father etc. With DSH having such a public online
identity your theory about trolls is blown out of the water. The board
knows much more about him than it does about it's other troll - YOU.

It's like being at the zoo - DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS. (which is of
course what I'm doing with you)

The Insipid One, the Lion, the Ice Princess. What next? The MOUTH? Now
who could that be?

David

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»