Fw: The Lion Of SGM

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Fw: The Lion Of SGM

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 28 nov 2007 04:45:53

For a moment I have to go against my convictions by acknowledging that
Spencer Hines still exists, but I have never said that Douglas Richardson
had a gay lover. To brawl in a gay bar usually means the brawler is not gay.

What does Richardson have that I would be envious about? I do not hate him,
how could I? I have never met him, that I may not agree with the way he
operates, is a different matter. In real life he most probably is the most
charming person imaginable, he must have something to stir up such strong
emotions. Not so long I gave him some help, off list, but he did not even
acknowledge that. There are only a few people who, for me, are totally
beyond the pale, and Douglas Richardson is not one of them.

No, my sign is not Leo, that it is Scorpio may be obvious. Over the last few
weeks I have passed on messages to gen-med from three different people, from
three different parts of the world. As has been said before, it is the
message that counts not the messenger.

----- Original Message -----
From: "D. Spencer Hines" <panther@excelsior.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: The Lion Of SGM


Wow!

Talk about...

Envy...

And:

Projected Hate...

Leo, certainly not a LION by any definition, has all of the above in
abundance for Douglas Richardson. [Leo The Lioness?]

Pure Vitriol...

Leo, who tells us Douglas was brawling in a gay leather bar, has been
rejected by HIS gay lover?...

And is BITTER to the max?

Or, is Leo simply serving as the sock puppet, front man,, stooge and shill
for Pogue Stewart again?

If so, he seems to heartily AGREE with Pogue Stewart. Vide infra.

Stay Tuned...

The plot thickens, Watson -- and the game's afoot.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

"Leo van de Pas" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:mailman.9.1196219130.13616.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com...

Dear Leo

I don't know why anyone would object to Douglas Richardson being called
the
Lion of the newsgroup, this seems quite apposite to me. Lions in the wild
are often aimless, mangy, injured creatures expelled from their own
prides,
and those few that are accepted by females tend to wander around putting
their stink over every rock and bush in a limited range, sniffing out &
eating each other's young while their mothers are off hunting, and lasting
only a breeding season or two before a stronger rival comes along. Not
unlike the big smelly, lazy genealogical cat from SLC in many ways.

Somehow, I do not think this is what Bill Arnold had in mind.
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message

D. Spencer Hines

Re: The Lion Of SGM

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 28 nov 2007 07:00:14

"Leo van de Pas" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:mailman.13.1196221607.13616.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com...

For a moment I have to go against my convictions by acknowledging that
Spencer Hines still exists, but I have never said that Douglas Richardson
had a gay lover. To brawl in a gay bar usually means the brawler is not
gay.

Straw Man... Leo is walking the cat back.

What does Richardson have that I would be envious about? I do not hate
him, how could I? I have never met him, that I may not agree with the way
he operates, is a different matter. In real life he most probably is the
most charming person imaginable, he must have something to stir up such
strong emotions. Not so long I gave him some help, off list, but he did
not even acknowledge that. There are only a few people who, for me, are
totally beyond the pale, and Douglas Richardson is not one of them.

DSH apparently IS one. <G>

No, my sign is not Leo, that it is Scorpio may be obvious. Over the last
few weeks I have passed on messages to gen-med from three different
people, from three different parts of the world. As has been said before,
it is the message that counts not the messenger.

Utter Nonsense.

An anonymous message is as worthless as a scrawl on a lavatory wall.

Sources must always be identified and vetted -- in Life as well as in
Genealogy.

More to the point, why doesn't Leo put a link to the download for his
Charlemagne file at his web page? ALL can then access it and provide him
with useful feedback and corrections, as appropriate.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

----- Original Message -----
From: "D. Spencer Hines" <panther@excelsior.com
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: The Lion Of SGM

Wow!

Talk about...

Envy...

And:

Projected Hate...

Leo, certainly not a LION by any definition, has all of the above in
abundance for Douglas Richardson. [Leo The Lioness?]

Pure Vitriol...

Leo, who tells us Douglas was brawling in a gay leather bar, has been
rejected by HIS gay lover?...

And is BITTER to the max?

Or, is Leo simply serving as the sock puppet, front man,, stooge and
shill for Pogue Stewart again?

If so, he seems to heartily AGREE with Pogue Stewart. Vide infra.

Stay Tuned...

The plot thickens, Watson -- and the game's afoot.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

"Leo van de Pas" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:mailman.9.1196219130.13616.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com...

Dear Leo

I don't know why anyone would object to Douglas Richardson being called
the
Lion of the newsgroup, this seems quite apposite to me. Lions in the wild
are often aimless, mangy, injured creatures expelled from their own
prides,
and those few that are accepted by females tend to wander around putting
their stink over every rock and bush in a limited range, sniffing out &
eating each other's young while their mothers are off hunting, and
lasting
only a breeding season or two before a stronger rival comes along. Not
unlike the big smelly, lazy genealogical cat from SLC in many ways.

Somehow, I do not think this is what Bill Arnold had in mind.
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»