Those photographs were beautifully done. The one thing I missed in your
e-mail is your opinion on the reliability of their premise, a line based on
Roderick Stuart seems rather risky. What do you think about this? Do you
endorse this?
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Richardson" <royalancestry@msn.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval, soc.history.medieval,
alt.history.british, alt.talk.royalty
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: "Order of the Merovingian Dynasty"
On Nov 24, 9:06 pm, Nathaniel Taylor <nltay...@nltaylor.net> wrote:
There's a whole set of lineages from various colonial American gateways
also on the site, all using the same path from Charlemagne to the
Merovingians, all citing Stuart. Among them is the line formerly
claimed for Walter Aston of Virginia.
Nat Taylorhttp://www.nltaylor.net
I've met Dr. Lucas. He's a fine individual.
One of the founding members of the Merovingian Society, by the way, is
the eminent genealogist, Timothy Field Beard, FASG. He attended the
first organizational meeting. A picture of all those who attended
that meeting is found at the following weblink:
http://www.merovingiandynasty.com/Ann.html
As for the "former" Walter Aston line, new evidence has surfaced in
recent time. The Aston line has now been fully reinstated.
Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message