Good Explanation.
What bothers me most about Leo's database are the "bare bones" aspect of it
and the clumsy, unsophisticated user interface of it.
Thanks.
DSH
"Doug McDonald" <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:fhl962$9ap$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
D. Spencer Hines wrote:
"Doug McDonald" <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:fhl5us$854$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
Doug McDonald wrote:
OK, here is what I believe is the biggest mistake in your database:
Why is it the BIGGEST mistake?
OK, that's highly debatable I suppose. It's big because
making it Sinclair does give a lot of people some
fairly good royal connections that Douglas does not, if
I recall correctly from when I was doing this up.
What is undeniably true, and the reason my mind had that
fixed in it, is that using the proprietary computer tools I have developed
for
comparing my own database with Leo's, swapping those two wives
makes the biggest "change list" for my own ahnentafel of any difference
I have found.
I have many differences between mine and Leo's. Most are just
simply because I stop going back into myth on a whim, and
Leo explicitly allows myths to remain if noted. There are some
other real differences of opinion, but most generate only a
few, or at most a few dozen people on the "change list" ...
this one generates thousands.
Doug McDonald