Fw: King Henry IV of England: The son of a butcher of Ghent

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Fw: King Henry IV of England: The son of a butcher of Ghent

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 13 nov 2007 00:24:47

Richardson pretends he always plays the ball (the subject) but when that is
dangerous grounds for him, he plays the man (or woman).

If he played the ball, he might have to admit that he made an error, and on
top of that tried to deceive everyone.

If only he would be mature enough to admit his failings (everyone has them)
this whole subject would have been finished.

But no Richardson has to hide in the tall grass of high dudgeon.

Such a pity. By the way, why haven't these messages been crossposted?

As always with best wishes
Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Richardson" <royalancestry@msn.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: King Henry IV of England: The son of a butcher of Ghent and
thecause of all bad weather


My comments are interspersed below. DR

On Nov 12, 2:43 pm, Leticia Cluff <leticia.cl...@nospam.gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:08:22 -0800, Douglas Richardson

royalances...@msn.com> wrote:
Um ... what is being sadly overlooked by Tish is the chief point I
was trying to make in my original post.

Can Tish tell us what that is? If you need help figuring it out,
Tish, I understand. I promise to be patient with you .... well as
patient as you deserve.

So go ahead ... tell us what you think I was trying to say. And,
please tell us the application of that point.

It's difficult to know WHAT you were trying to say. You change your
opinions in stealth and insidiously try to obliterate any evidence
of
your mistakes.

Wrong answer. One big Google star for you.

Is it a misrepresentation to say that you silently deleted a post
from
Google and posted a revised version saying the exact opposite of
something you wrote in the deleted post? Is it a misrepresentation
to
say that you realized your error after reading a post from Leo?

You clearly missed the point of the original post. You're definitely
focused on being negative. You're more interested in arguing than
learning. And you repeat yourself again and again. On the whole you
come across as rather narcissistic. That's a fancy word for you have
a big ego. Also, your analytical ability is rather limited. You
focus on emotional issues, not factual ones. That prevents you from
seeing the bigger picture. And you have little sense of humor.

We might all learn something from this yet.

Clearly you have learned nothing so far. So if you'll kindly step
out of the way, Tish, we'll get back to the central issue of the
testimony of John Sparrowhawk. And, to save everyone a lot of grief,
I'm putting you on ignore for the time being. So sorry. You had
your chance and blew it.

Tish

Watch her scream now.

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»