re-writes the same message to make it look he said the right thing, and
hopes people are not catching on to his tricks. And so he is setting the
record straight, in a very dishonest fashion. At least he should have
acknowledged he was wrong the first time.
Richardson, no doubt, has done this for his "Google" image. Has he already
removed the original message? and replaced it with the sanitised version?
Is this what you learn when you become a "trained historian and
genealogist"?
Not good.
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Richardson" <royalancestry@msn.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: King Henry IV of England: The son of a butcher of Ghent
andthecause of all bad weather
On Nov 12, 1:18 am, "Leo van de Pas" <leovd...@netspeed.com.au> wrote:
I wonder (not really) why Richardson sends the same message a second
time.
Is this his way of "setting the record straight"?
For the second time (for emphasis, of course), the wording of the
document does not mean that the king himself heard the testimony
himself. Rather, the lawsuit stipulates that the testimony was heard
before the king's coroner, who was acting under the "authority and
command of the king." The text speaks for itself.
DR
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message