Fw: Jewish Dynasty: Bush, Churchill, Roosevelt, royal famili

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Fw: Jewish Dynasty: Bush, Churchill, Roosevelt, royal famili

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 04 nov 2007 23:57:23

Sorry to be rude, crude and vulgar.But what a lot of garbage.

"Bush is closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne and
has kinship with every member of Britain's royal family, the House of
Windsor."

What is a relative? A first cousin? A second cousin? A 3rd? A 6th? Where do
we stop regarding related people as a "relative"? In think in many societies
even a second cousin is stretching it.

For George W and Queen Elizabeth II I found as a common ancestor John
Knyvett 1517-1561 this makes them 13th cousins. Do you really think Queen
Elizabeth II regards every "13th cousin" a close relative? Gary Boyd Roberts
is his book on the American presidents "stretches the imagination" for
George W to a "almost certainly" 12th cousin or so to Lady Diana Spencer and
she is not Queen Elizabeth II. He also shows that George W's mother is about
26 generations removed from King Henry II of England 1133-1189.

Do you really think that the governments of the countries "ruled" by "close
relatives" of George W really think "We must support George W _because_ he
is "closely related" to our monarch?

Get real. In the foreword of a book published in 1929 is discussed people
with Anglo-Saxon blood : "Every one of us is descended from William
the Conqueror, and Anglo-Saxons are, all of us, at least thirtieth cousins
to each other". And there goes the exclusiveness for George W as a "close
relative" of Queen Elizabeth II. My guess is that people with Anglo-Saxon
blood can be found in every country in the world.

We have been, again, the victims of crossposting. I wonder when Douglas
Richardson, who supports this, is going to tell us about the benefits of
crossposting.

With best wishes
Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia



----- Original Message -----
From: "YTR" <zzzxtyryyetytryey@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: aus.politics, can.politics,
soc.genealogy.medieval,alt.conspiracy.new-world-order
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 8:47 AM
Subject: Jewish Dynasty: Bush, Churchill, Roosevelt,royal families of europe
all from same bloodline


While President Bush's war policy is strongly opposed by the leaders
of Europe's largest republics, Germany, France, and Russia, he is
supported by those nations where royal families are still in power, or
close to it: Britain, Spain, The Netherlands, and Bulgaria. What the
U.S. mainstream media fails to mention is that he is actually related
to the royal families of those European states where his policy on
Iraq is supported.

As the media reported during the election of 2000, Bush is closely
related to every European monarch on and off the throne and has
kinship with every member of Britain's royal family, the House of
Windsor.

Saxe-Coburg Gotha is the true name of Britain's royal family, but the
name was changed to hide their German ancestry during the First World
War.

Bush has more ties to European royalty than other president to date,
having "blue blood" from both his paternal and maternal lines. His
mother, Barbara Pierce Bush, is related to European royalty through
the Pierce family, which also produced the fourteenth U.S. president,
Franklin Pierce (1853-1857).

Harold Brooks-Baker of London's Burke Peerage says Bush's royal
connections are startling. "Bush is closely related to every European
monarch both on and off the throne," Baker told American Free Press.

"They are cousins." Baker said when asked about the relationship
between Bush and the Bulgarian prime minister, Simeon Saxe-Coburg
Gotha, who visited the White House on Feb. 25. Gotha is the former
King of Bulgaria who was returned to power after decades spent in
exile.

About the apparent close relationship between Bush and the Spanish
king, Juan Carlos, Baker said: "They know they are related." Asked why
the media fails to report these family ties, Brooks-Baker said, "The
American public does not know who these kings are. Not one person in a
thousand has any idea who these people are."

"Mr. Gore and Mr. Bush have an unusually large number of royal and
noble descents," Baker said during the election campaign of 2000. "In
point of fact, never in the history of the United States have two
presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances."

There has always been a significant "royalty factor" in those who
aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas
Jefferson, Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, among
some 30 other presidents, all boasting blue blood links.

Asked if the support of the European royals for Bush's war policy
could be attributed to the fact that these families are heavily
invested in the leading oil companies, Brooks-Baker said, "That's an
interesting question. Indeed, Royal Dutch Shell petroleum made Queen
Beatrix of Holland one of the richest women in the world. She owns
more land in New York and the United States than any other foreigner."

Queen Beatrix, the matriarch of the secretive Bilderberg group, is
like Queen Elisabeth of Britain and is not allowed to play a public
role in political matters. Behind the scenes, however, these monarchs
continue to exercise political influence.

Asked if he thought that kinship with the European royals was the
reason for their support of Bush's war policy, Brooks-Baker said: "I
don't think there is any question about it. These people are obsessed
with supporting relations. It has a great deal to do with it. They all
work together as one family."

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/merov ... ios_02.htm

http://www.illuminati-news.com/royal-trees.htm
How Our "Elected" and Appointed Politicians Are Connected By Bloodlines


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Gjest

Re: Fw: Jewish Dynasty: Bush, Churchill, Roosevelt, royal fa

Legg inn av Gjest » 05 nov 2007 01:20:54

On Nov 4, 2:57 pm, "Leo van de Pas" <leovd...@netspeed.com.au> wrote:
Sorry to be rude, crude and vulgar.But what a lot of garbage.

"Bush is closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne and
has kinship with every member of Britain's royal family, the House of
Windsor."

What is a relative? A first cousin? A second cousin? A 3rd? A 6th? Where do
we stop regarding related people as a "relative"? In think in many societies
even a second cousin is stretching it.


As little as I wish to perpetuate this thread, let me just say that
this is not the last we will seeeen of this nonsense. For the past
several American elections, this clown from Burkes has duped the news
media into giving him another fifteen minutes of fame with his "the
candidate with the best royal descent always wins" lie. I am sure we
will see it again as soon as the final candidates are chosen. His
every-four-year moment in the sun seems to have proved insufficient,
as he is now peddling his garbage to the xenophobic conspiracy pseudo-
press.

Please ignore it and hope it goes away quickly.

taf

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»