Duke Charles Brandon? That he was a Duke had nothing to do with his surname.
He was not Charles, Duke Brandon, nor Duke Charles Brandon. He was as
Michael said. You should not make such mistakes as some people may think you
know what you are talking about and copy it.
The less genealogical mistakes made the better.
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Richardson" <royalancestry@msn.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval,soc.history.medieval,alt.history.british
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:46 AM
Subject: Re: Possible C.P. Addition: Margaret Neville's marriage to John
orThomas or Robert Horne
On Sep 5, 9:36 am, mj...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 5 Sep., 05:58, Douglas Richardson <royalances...@msn.com> wrote:
Dear Newsgroup ~
Reading the passage in Complete Peerage that deals with Duke
Charles
Brandon's divorce from his 1st wife,
(snip)
Reviewing the Brandon family tree, I find that Duke Charles
Brandon's
paternal grandmother
When offering corrections to CP, it is perhaps advisable not to use
amateur and erroneous terms such as "Duke Charles Brandon" when
referring to Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk. "Charles
Brandon"
or "Charles, Duke of Suffolk" or "the 1st Duke of Suffolk" are
perfectly good alternatives, but "Duke Charles Brandon" makes the
subject sound like a used car salesman, and its author appear to be
someone who knows nothing about the British Peerage.
MA-R
Guess Mike has never heard of King Harry or Good Queen Bess.
DR
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message