Fw: Counting Descendants

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Fw: Counting Descendants

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 01 sep 2007 18:59:55

I think Hines needs glasses. Peter Stewart quoted a dictionary which stated
that my interpretation of "Amongst descendants" is perfectly acceptable.

Again your whinging about the mentioning about your wife is pitiful. You are
the one who brought in my niece and Peter Stewart's relatives. You wouldn't
be aiming at a double standard? What is good for the goose is good for the
gander.

Talking about fixation, who keeps on about "Amongst descendants"? After
Peter Stewart's remarks are you going to admit that you are wrong? Or are
you continuing to screw that pooch?

Tell me who is Thomas Howard Dean? You seem to know him?


----- Original Message -----
From: "D. Spencer Hines" <panther@excelsior.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 3:36 AM
Subject: Re: Counting Descendants


"Amongst descendants" belong spouses, as otherwise there would be no next
generation. Apparently you have not grasped that fact. I wonder what
Kuniko
thinks about this attitude that spouses "do not belong to a family".
Interesting attitude. De Jure Descendants (spouses) are an essential part
of any family." -- Leo van de Pas
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Leo just keeps wriggling and throwing out red herrings. Also, my WIFE has
no part in this discussion. He needs to leave her out of it. I'm not
talking about his BOYFRIENDS in this venue. But if he wants to open up
that
unsavory door to a back room, so be it...

1. That's not what Leo originally wrote -- "...belong to a family".

2. THIS is what he wrote:

"A very kind person helped me with information about the Stuyvesant
family,
I have digested this and made a file just to see what it brought together
and it is quite amazing (to me) who are to be found amongst the
descendants
of this family. Kirk Douglas, Montgomery Clift, Eleanor Roosevelt, Robert
Traill Spence Lowel IV, Adam von Trott zu Solz (involved in the conspiracy
against Hitler), Princess Maria Antonia de Braganca, Infanta of Portugal,
and many others." -- Leo van de Pas

3. ALL the others named above are allegedly DESCENDANTS of a STUYVESANT.

Kirk Douglas is NOT.

Let's use a biological example. We have a list of sea animals here -- a
dolphin, an oyster, an octopus, a shark, a crab -- AND then we spot a
PANTHER, the first one on the list.

Kirk Douglas is the PANTHER. -- He doesn't FIT.

Kirk Douglas is NOT a Stuyvesant Descendant, whereas the FIVE others
allegedly ARE Stuyvesant Descendants.

4. Leo doesn't even know what a DESCENDANT is in GENEALOGY!

Hilarius Magnus Cum Laude!

A self-professed Genealogist, constantly working in the English language,
who doesn't even understand what a DESCENDANT is....

Further, Leo is flummoxed, farbissen and farblondjet -- so, he wriggles,
throws out red herring strawmen and tries to move the goal posts.

His latest gaffe is in confusing Howard Dean of Vermont with Tom Kean of
New
Jersey.

Victoria, it just doesn't get any better than this.

And he has some sort of fixation on "trhe East Coast of Europe".

What's THAT All About?

Enjoy!

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message

D. Spencer Hines

Re: Counting Descendants

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 01 sep 2007 20:00:57

What is Leo The Flake babbling about now?

First it was Kirk Douglas as a Stuyvesant Descendant, then it was "trhe East
Coast of Europe" -- now it is THOMAS HOWARD DEAN.

Leo the Flake is the only one here to have mentioned an alleged _Thomas
Howard Dean_, not I.

My original post is quoted in its entirety below.

Leo The Flake, who has tripped himself up in his own slippery red herrings
and fallen with a resounding thud on his large kawumpus, needs to:

Read, Mark, Learn & Inwardly Digest.

Leo The Flake has one, among several, very nasty and meretricious
traits ---- he makes INSINUATIONS and ACCUSATIONS about what I have written,
but is too much of a COWARD to quote me DIRECTLY, CORRECTLY and VERBATIM --
because he knows he'd look like an even BIGGER FOOL if he dared to do so.

'Nuff Said.

For the nonce, I leave Leo The Flake to play with his BOYFRIENDS, whatever
games they choose to play today -- a Sunday in Australia -- perhaps a Black
Mass on the altar, stickfinger among the bushes in the park, hide the salami
in the back bedroom -- use your imagination.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

"Leo van de Pas" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:mailman.1664.1188670031.7287.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com...

Tell me who is Thomas Howard Dean? You seem to know him?

----- Original Message -----

From: "D. Spencer Hines" <panther@excelsior.com>
Newsgroups: alt.history.british,soc.genealogy.medieval,soc.history.medieval
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Fraud Most Foul

Fraud Most Foul is a bit too severe...

But has Leo screwed the pooch here and confused Howard Dean with the
former Governor of New Jersey, Tom Kean?

DSH

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

"Leo van de Pas" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:mailman.1617.1188595918.7287.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com...

When I realised how many of her descendants were also Stuyvesant
descendants, this rekindled my interest into her descendants. At the
moment I have 820 descendants of Anneke Jans in my system.

Amongst the interesting descendants I can find...

Thomas Howard Dean, Governor of New Jersey [sic]

Leo The Flake...

Hoist With His Own Petar Yet Again!

KAWHOMP!

KERSPLAT!

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»