----- Original Message -----
From: "D. Spencer Hines" <panther@excelsior.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Death In Show Business World -- Don Jose Luis de
VillalongayCabeza de Vaca
"Leo van de Pas" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:mailman.1616.1188593962.7287.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com...
Stop frotting [sic] at the mouth, you might choke.
Hilarious! Leo certainly hasn't learned "scholarly English" -- even at
7th
grade level.
=======Have I ever said I did?
You berate me and then you do the same for the children of Nat Taylor,
you
are so predictable.
Leo sadly and obviously doesn't understand American humor.
======Humor is one thing, but I would not range viscious belittling under
that heading. How do you think Nat Taylor thinks about it?
Sadly it won't get you anywhere nearer to a file containing Stuyvesant
descendants.
I'm not drooling for such a file, because I know it will be riddled with
errors -- one of which I even pointed out previously.
==========Which error did you point out?
But I do you a deal, you make an acceptable descendants list which does
not display spouses, just to show me how the big boys do it, and I might
reconsider. It might not be a good idea to go and sit behind a huge map
of
the world, you might be distracted trying to find trhe [sic] East Coast
of
Europe.
????????? What is this fascination Leo has about "trhe East Coast of
Europe?"
=======Spencer that is just to remind you that you are slipping. You have
passed by so many errors, it _is_ quite funny. And this one was one of your
worst. As a sailor you should know something about the world, but apparently
you don't even know what is east or west. Quite HILARIOUS.
Any fool can make a list of DESCENDANTS of A without including spouses'
names. William Reitwiesner frequently does it.
Leo The Compiler should consult a REAL GENEALOGIST, such as WAR, to see
how
it's done.
=============== Wasn't WAR entitled the Rottweiler by you? How much respect
do you have for him?
Here's a brief one: Henry II > John > Henry III > Edward I > Edward II
Edward III.
========Now it is my turn to teach you some English. I have asked you to
produce an acceptable list of descendantS, not a line, all known children
all known grandchildren and so on in full detail. Admit it you can't.
Given another TWENTY years perhaps Leo can learn what a DESCENDANT is.
=========You think I do not know, but then can you _think?_
You do not seem to see how nasty a petal you are, two days ago it was Peter
Stewart who needed to be derided, yesterday it was me, today it is Nathaniel
Taylor, who tomorrow?
You so dishonestly claim, by repeating Douglas Richardson's remark "we are
here to make friends", but do you have any?
Again, so HILARIOUSLY best wishes, do rush off to Victoria and tell her
Leo van de Pas