You do stun me, "Amongst the descendants" you do find spouses, as otherwise
the descendants list would be incomplete, why should they not be mentioned
when I said that I had made a list? I regard Kirk Douglas as a greater star
than his son Michael.
.
Spencer Hines is only stirring, as I declined to send him that list.
Here he is destroying Gen-Med but expects all the curtesies?
I told him and everyone, that the information in due course will be
available on Genealogics, let him wait for that.
As it is, I am stunned with the amount of information that has been made
available, from several different directions, after I had made that list. I
have been busy adding the new information but I am far from finished.
Best wishes
Leo
.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jwc1870@aol.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL@rootsweb.com
Cc: <Jwc1870@AOL..com
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Quantifying The Number Of Distant Ancestors
Dear Leo,
I have to agree with Spencer on the point that not every
spouse among the descendants of an individual should be counted as
themselves a
descendant. no matter whom the Father or the Mother may be. Some are (In
this
case [Isabel de Vermandois] it is likely that several couples are in
fact both
descended from her, yet several is not all.
Sincerely,
James W Cummings
Dixmont, Maine USA
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new
AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message