been a reason. And why does Cahiers de Saint Louis call her Mathilde, Dame
de Roeux? Also confusingly there is a Roeulx as well.
Leo van de Pas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Richardson" <royalancestry@msn.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval,soc.history.medieval,alt.history.british
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Maud de Holand, wife of Hugh de Courtenay, Knt.,and Waleran de
Luxembourg, Count of Ligny & St.-Pol
P.S. In my post just now I stated that Pere Anselme referred to Maud
de Holand as "Maud de Roeux." He actually called her ""Mahaud de
Roeux." Be it Maud or Mahaud, though, the "de Roeux" of her name is
just plain wrong.
DR
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message