From: "D. Spencer Hines" <panther@excelsior.com>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: Death of Edward II
Mortimers do not need to be descendants of Roger Mortimer [1287-1330], 1st
Earl of March to be RELATED to him... OR just have the Mortimer surname
and
not be ABLE to prove or disprove a given connection.
...But perhaps still have an ax to grind.
'Nuff Said.
DSH
I don't think people need to have the surname Mortimer to have an axe to
grind. It seems some keep on grinding and grinding, saying very little and
achieve even less.
"Leo van de Pas" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:mailman.126.1186113687.31452.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com...
You were talking about _related_ Mortimer lines-----and I presume you
meant Mortimers related to Roger Mortimer in any way----except male line
connections. I did not say it had to be Ian Mortimer's family. I too
implied Roger had many descendants and I even mentioned a few.
With best wishes
Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message