Why Genealogy is Bunk: Swallowing the DNA Poison Pill

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
V. Chris and Tom Tinney,

Why Genealogy is Bunk: Swallowing the DNA Poison Pill

Legg inn av V. Chris and Tom Tinney, » 26 jun 2007 16:33:00

Why Genealogy is Bunk: Swallowing the DNA Poison Pill

Eastman's Online Genealogy Newsletter notes,
as of June 20, 2007, that, in "A Video Interview
with David Nicholson" . . . " David gives a brief
background of the research you can accomplish
by using DNA. Would you believe 170,000 years?"
http://eogn.typepad.com/

This is the DNA poison pill for all WRITTEN records.
This is the poison pill for all cultural history.
We only have records back circa 6,000 years.
What does 6K or less [circa A.D. 1500] do for
someone who can spit into the more esoteric
170K time frame? It is all meaningless from
an evolutionary standpoint, is it not? As well
as emotion, feeling, caring, or remembering?

"The central idea of biological evolution is that
all life on Earth shares a common ancestor,
just as you and your cousins share a common
grandmother." NOT. This empty idea justifies
wars, killing the weak, Jews, innocents and outcasts.
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... 0_0/evo_02

Respectfully yours,

Tom Tinney, Sr.
Who's Who in America,
Millennium Edition [54th] through 2004
Who's Who In Genealogy and Heraldry, [both editions]
Family Genealogy & History Internet Education Directory
http://www.academic-genealogy.com/

Gjest

Re: Why Genealogy is Bunk: Swallowing the DNA Poison Pill

Legg inn av Gjest » 27 jun 2007 06:35:15

On Jun 26, 8:33 am, "V. Chris and Tom Tinney, Sr."
<vctin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Why Genealogy is Bunk: Swallowing the DNA Poison Pill

Eastman's Online Genealogy Newsletter notes,
as of June 20, 2007, that, in "A Video Interview
with David Nicholson" . . . " David gives a brief
background of the research you can accomplish
by using DNA. Would you believe 170,000 years?"http://eogn.typepad.com/

This is the DNA poison pill for all WRITTEN records.
This is the poison pill for all cultural history.
We only have records back circa 6,000 years.
What does 6K or less [circa A.D. 1500] do for
someone who can spit into the more esoteric
170K time frame? It is all meaningless from
an evolutionary standpoint, is it not? As well
as emotion, feeling, caring, or remembering?

"The central idea of biological evolution is that
all life on Earth shares a common ancestor,
just as you and your cousins share a common
grandmother." NOT. This empty idea justifies
wars, killing the weak, Jews, innocents and outcasts.http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... 0_0/evo_02

Respectfully yours,

Tom Tinney, Sr.
Who's Who in America,
Millennium Edition [54th] through 2004
Who's Who In Genealogy and Heraldry, [both editions]
Family Genealogy & History Internet Education Directoryhttp://www.academic-genealogy.com/

You are confusing the concept of organic evolution with social
Darwinism. Darwin himself did not extend his ideas on evolution to
human society - only to the human animal . You don't even make any
sense - nor do the people you are quoting. What's the point of your
hysteria?

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»