More on the Reve family

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
John Matthews

More on the Reve family

Legg inn av John Matthews » 20 feb 2007 11:35:51

The Court of Chivalry (web link posted by John Brandon recently) has a
case brought against Gabriel Reve of St Bride's, draper, in 1637. Is
he related to the Reve family of Bury St Edmonds, and if so, how?

John Matthews

Gjest

Re: More on the Reve family

Legg inn av Gjest » 03 mar 2007 07:51:41

On Feb 20, 9:35 pm, "John Matthews" <rjmatsleep...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
The Court of Chivalry (web link posted by John Brandon recently) has a
case brought against GabrielReveof St Bride's, draper, in 1637. Is
he related to theRevefamily of Bury St Edmonds, and if so, how?

John Matthews

Dear John, Can you please direct me to find this link. I have a
particular interest in the Reve family of Bury St. Edmunds. Is the
coat of arms mentioned in this case?

D.W. Reeves

John Matthews

Re: More on the Reve family

Legg inn av John Matthews » 05 mar 2007 07:33:30

On 3 Mar, 06:51, davidma...@iprimus.com.au wrote:
On Feb 20, 9:35 pm, "John Matthews" <rjmatsleep...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

The Court of Chivalry (web link posted by John Brandon recently) has a
case brought against GabrielReveof St Bride's, draper, in 1637. Is
he related to theRevefamily of Bury St Edmonds, and if so, how?

John Matthews

Dear John, Can you please direct me to find this link. I have a
particular interest in the Reve family of Bury St. Edmunds. Is the
coat of arms mentioned in this case?

D.W. Reeves

The web address is indeed the one in the previous post. There is no
mention of the arms. Here is what is said.

John Matthews

Initial proceedings
3/29, Petition to Arundel
'Your petitioner is a gent. descended of an ancient family; and that
lately hee hath beene greatly abused in words by one Gabriel Reeve of
the parish of St Brydes London, draper, who gave your petitioner the
lye many times and termeing him base fellowe.'

Petitioned that Reeve be brought to answer.

Duck informed Dethick that the case was fit for the court, 24 November
1637.

Summary of proceedings
Dr Duck acted as counsel for Strachey and on 15 December 1637,
Strachey noted that his bond to prosecute the cause had been received.

Notes
Neither party appears in the 1633-5 or 1664 Visitations of London: J.
Jackson Howard and J. L. Chester (eds.), The Visitation of London,
1633, 1634 and, 1635, vol. I (Publications of the Harleian Society,
15, 1880); J. Jackson Howard (ed.), The Visitation of London, 1633,
1634 and, 1635, vol. II (Publications of the Harleian Society, 17,
1883); J. B. Whitmore and A. W. Hughes Clarke (eds.), London
Visitation Pedigrees, 1664 (Publications of the Harleian Society, 92,
1940).

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»