Peter Lacy

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
paul bulkley

Peter Lacy

Legg inn av paul bulkley » 29 jan 2007 17:56:01

Dear Douglas Richardson:

You claimed that Peter Lacy was not the illegitimate
son of Earl John Lacy, and based your claim on
National Archives document SC8/270/13488.

This document is a letter addressed to the king
requesting that bailiffs of Dover be instructed to
allow them (certain named individuals) to cross the
sea as the bailiffs had been instructed not to permit
this.

Individual mentioned in this letter included "Peter de
Cestria kinsman and clerk of Edmund de Lacy"

Contrary to your claim, this letter and the
information therein is not evidence that Peter Lacy
was or was not the illegitimate son of Earl John Lacy.

Sincerely Yours,

Paul Bulkley



____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»