Mauleverer 1100-1300
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
-
Alex Maxwell Findlater
Mauleverer 1100-1300
Dear Friends
I am trying to find Mauleverers in the period 1100-1300. I expect that
they might be in Yorkshire, or perhaps Cumberland or Northumberland.
There was a family in Arncliffe (N of Skipton) in the C16, who
apparently descend from a family at Wothersome, which is either in/near
Leeds or near Wetherby. I also found one on SMG mentioned in a Thweng
mortification in the C14.
I would expect references to the family in 1100-1300 in Early Yorkshire
Charters by Clay or in the work of Farrer. Unfortunately I have access
to neither. If anyone has access a look at the index to see if it is
worth my making a long jounrey would be much appreciated.
Very many thanks
Alex
I am trying to find Mauleverers in the period 1100-1300. I expect that
they might be in Yorkshire, or perhaps Cumberland or Northumberland.
There was a family in Arncliffe (N of Skipton) in the C16, who
apparently descend from a family at Wothersome, which is either in/near
Leeds or near Wetherby. I also found one on SMG mentioned in a Thweng
mortification in the C14.
I would expect references to the family in 1100-1300 in Early Yorkshire
Charters by Clay or in the work of Farrer. Unfortunately I have access
to neither. If anyone has access a look at the index to see if it is
worth my making a long jounrey would be much appreciated.
Very many thanks
Alex
-
Tim Powys-Lybbe
Re: Mauleverer 1100-1300
In message of 12 Oct, "Alex Maxwell Findlater"
<maxwellfindlater@hotmail.com> wrote:
Vol IX has several minor references to the Mauleverer fee of the honour
of Skipton. I can't check vols I to III or VII as I don't have them.
--
Tim Powys-Lybbe tim@powys.org
For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/
<maxwellfindlater@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Friends
I am trying to find Mauleverers in the period 1100-1300. I expect
that they might be in Yorkshire, or perhaps Cumberland or
Northumberland. There was a family in Arncliffe (N of Skipton) in the
C16, who apparently descend from a family at Wothersome, which is
either in/near Leeds or near Wetherby. I also found one on SMG
mentioned in a Thweng mortification in the C14.
I would expect references to the family in 1100-1300 in Early
Yorkshire Charters by Clay or in the work of Farrer. Unfortunately I
have access to neither. If anyone has access a look at the index to
see if it is worth my making a long jounrey would be much appreciated.
Vol IX has several minor references to the Mauleverer fee of the honour
of Skipton. I can't check vols I to III or VII as I don't have them.
--
Tim Powys-Lybbe tim@powys.org
For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/
-
John P. Ravilious
Re: Mauleverer 1100-1300
[duplicate message]
Saturday, 14 October, 2006
Dear Alex,
There is an interesting pedigree given in Wrottesley's
Pedigrees from the Plea Rolls which hopefully will lead to
resolving (part of) the Mauleverer problem. The full entry,
from late 1327, traces two Mauleverer branches back to ca.
1189-1199 ("temp. King Richard"), and reads as follows:
" De Banco, Mich., 20 E. II,. m. 195.
Ebor. - John Mauleverer sued Richard, son of Stephen
Walays, of Helagh, for eighteen messuages, two mills,
and twenty-four bovates of land, etc., in Nether
Dunsford and Over Dunsford. The pleadings give
this pedigree:
_____________________________________
I I
Ralph, temp. King Richard. Henry.
I I
I I
William. Richard.
_______I_______________ I
I I I
Robert, Joan, Henry.
ob. s.p. ob. s.p. I
I
John.
I
I
John Mauleverer,
the plaintiff. " [1]
The land in dispute in 1327 was located in what is now known
as Over Dunsforth and Lower Dunsforth, Aldborough, W.R. Yorkshire.
The other related document I note is given below, from the
Calendar of Close Rolls, dated at York, 26 Aug. 1327 - which
relates indirectly to the land in Yorkshire in dispute above.
' Enrolment of indenture made between Sir William de Kyme
and Sir Richard Waleys at York, on 17 August, 1 Edward
III., witnessing that whereas Richard has made two
recognisances to William in chancery, one for 400l. and
the other for 300l., William grants that the recognisance
for the former sum shall be cancelled if Richard enfeoff
Stephen, his son and heir, and Annora (Anore), daughter of
Richard de Umframvill, late earl of Anegos, of the manor
of Burghwaleys before Christmas next, to have to them
and the heirs of the bodies, with reversion to Richard and
his heirs, and if Richard do not alienate the manors of
Neuton Waleys, Over Dunsford, and Nether Dunsford, and do
not divest himself of the manors hereafter, whereby
Stephen and Annora or the heirs of their bodies shall be
disturbed after Richard's death from entering and holding
the said manors as of Stephen's inheritance. William
also grants that the other recognisance shall be annulled
if Richard pay to him the 200 marks that he received
for the marriage of Stephen and Annora within a year after
Annora's death, in case she die within a year of the making
of this indenture. Richard agrees that the recognisances
shall remain in effect if he do not fulfill the conditions
aforesaid.
Memorandum, that William and Richard came into
chancery at York, on the said day, and acknowledge the
above deed. ' [2]
There is some record partially visible via Google Books in a
volume of YAJ (either Yorkshire Archaeological, or Yorkshire Arch.
and Topographical Assn - unclear which vol. or year) where on
p. 176 of that volume an entry records,
' John Mauleverer held of the said John de Bella aqua, of the
inheritance aforesaid, 14 carucates in Allerton,......, Dunsforth,
Little Ouseburn, Hopperton,.... '
Perhaps further venturesome queries into Google will find the
elusive volume. Hope the foregoing is helpful.
Cheers,
John
NOTES
[1] Gen. the Honourable George Wrottesley, Pedigrees from the
Plea Rolls (The Antiquary, January-June 1890), XXI:102.
oddly enough, currently accessible via GoogleBooks:
http://books.google.com/books?vid=LCCN0 ... ISO-8859-1
[2] CCR 1 Edw. III (1327-1330), p. 220, mem. 15d.
also accessible,
http://books.google.com/books?vid=0KrGv ... ISO-8859-1
* John P. Ravilious
Alex Maxwell Findlater wrote:
Saturday, 14 October, 2006
Dear Alex,
There is an interesting pedigree given in Wrottesley's
Pedigrees from the Plea Rolls which hopefully will lead to
resolving (part of) the Mauleverer problem. The full entry,
from late 1327, traces two Mauleverer branches back to ca.
1189-1199 ("temp. King Richard"), and reads as follows:
" De Banco, Mich., 20 E. II,. m. 195.
Ebor. - John Mauleverer sued Richard, son of Stephen
Walays, of Helagh, for eighteen messuages, two mills,
and twenty-four bovates of land, etc., in Nether
Dunsford and Over Dunsford. The pleadings give
this pedigree:
_____________________________________
I I
Ralph, temp. King Richard. Henry.
I I
I I
William. Richard.
_______I_______________ I
I I I
Robert, Joan, Henry.
ob. s.p. ob. s.p. I
I
John.
I
I
John Mauleverer,
the plaintiff. " [1]
The land in dispute in 1327 was located in what is now known
as Over Dunsforth and Lower Dunsforth, Aldborough, W.R. Yorkshire.
The other related document I note is given below, from the
Calendar of Close Rolls, dated at York, 26 Aug. 1327 - which
relates indirectly to the land in Yorkshire in dispute above.
' Enrolment of indenture made between Sir William de Kyme
and Sir Richard Waleys at York, on 17 August, 1 Edward
III., witnessing that whereas Richard has made two
recognisances to William in chancery, one for 400l. and
the other for 300l., William grants that the recognisance
for the former sum shall be cancelled if Richard enfeoff
Stephen, his son and heir, and Annora (Anore), daughter of
Richard de Umframvill, late earl of Anegos, of the manor
of Burghwaleys before Christmas next, to have to them
and the heirs of the bodies, with reversion to Richard and
his heirs, and if Richard do not alienate the manors of
Neuton Waleys, Over Dunsford, and Nether Dunsford, and do
not divest himself of the manors hereafter, whereby
Stephen and Annora or the heirs of their bodies shall be
disturbed after Richard's death from entering and holding
the said manors as of Stephen's inheritance. William
also grants that the other recognisance shall be annulled
if Richard pay to him the 200 marks that he received
for the marriage of Stephen and Annora within a year after
Annora's death, in case she die within a year of the making
of this indenture. Richard agrees that the recognisances
shall remain in effect if he do not fulfill the conditions
aforesaid.
Memorandum, that William and Richard came into
chancery at York, on the said day, and acknowledge the
above deed. ' [2]
There is some record partially visible via Google Books in a
volume of YAJ (either Yorkshire Archaeological, or Yorkshire Arch.
and Topographical Assn - unclear which vol. or year) where on
p. 176 of that volume an entry records,
' John Mauleverer held of the said John de Bella aqua, of the
inheritance aforesaid, 14 carucates in Allerton,......, Dunsforth,
Little Ouseburn, Hopperton,.... '
Perhaps further venturesome queries into Google will find the
elusive volume. Hope the foregoing is helpful.
Cheers,
John
NOTES
[1] Gen. the Honourable George Wrottesley, Pedigrees from the
Plea Rolls (The Antiquary, January-June 1890), XXI:102.
oddly enough, currently accessible via GoogleBooks:
http://books.google.com/books?vid=LCCN0 ... ISO-8859-1
[2] CCR 1 Edw. III (1327-1330), p. 220, mem. 15d.
also accessible,
http://books.google.com/books?vid=0KrGv ... ISO-8859-1
* John P. Ravilious
Alex Maxwell Findlater wrote:
Dear Friends
I am trying to find Mauleverers in the period 1100-1300. I expect that
they might be in Yorkshire, or perhaps Cumberland or Northumberland.
There was a family in Arncliffe (N of Skipton) in the C16, who
apparently descend from a family at Wothersome, which is either in/near
Leeds or near Wetherby. I also found one on SMG mentioned in a Thweng
mortification in the C14.
I would expect references to the family in 1100-1300 in Early Yorkshire
Charters by Clay or in the work of Farrer. Unfortunately I have access
to neither. If anyone has access a look at the index to see if it is
worth my making a long jounrey would be much appreciated.
Very many thanks
Alex
-
Alex Maxwell Findlater
Re: Mauleverer 1100-1300
Dear John
Thank you very much for this help. Unfortunately the Google books
quotes seem to have disappeared, or else I am being stupid. However,
the pedigree is very helpful.
It seems that they were an old family based at Allerton Mauleverer near
Wetherby, until the C18, when the line ran out and the estate went to
Viscount Galway. One of them was a regicide and was married to a
Bourchier, also a regicide family. They were created baronets in the
1600s. The cadet family I mentioned was not at Arncliffe N of Skipton,
but at Ingilby Arncliffe, near Wetherby.
I was particularly interested in the branch who settled in Annandale
1124-1300 or perhaps later. I imagine that they were cadets as the
Christian names do not tie up. In Annandale we have a Hugh I, a
Humphrey and a Hugh II, but with little clear dating information. They
appear there as witnesses.
many thanks
Alex
Thank you very much for this help. Unfortunately the Google books
quotes seem to have disappeared, or else I am being stupid. However,
the pedigree is very helpful.
It seems that they were an old family based at Allerton Mauleverer near
Wetherby, until the C18, when the line ran out and the estate went to
Viscount Galway. One of them was a regicide and was married to a
Bourchier, also a regicide family. They were created baronets in the
1600s. The cadet family I mentioned was not at Arncliffe N of Skipton,
but at Ingilby Arncliffe, near Wetherby.
I was particularly interested in the branch who settled in Annandale
1124-1300 or perhaps later. I imagine that they were cadets as the
Christian names do not tie up. In Annandale we have a Hugh I, a
Humphrey and a Hugh II, but with little clear dating information. They
appear there as witnesses.
many thanks
Alex
-
Rosie Bevan
Re: Mauleverer 1100-1300
Dear Alex
The Mauleverer family descended from Richard Mauleverer of Allerton
Mauleverer, tenant of the Brus fee in Yorkshire, who was living early
in the 12th century. The main branch of this family died out as given
in John's pedigree and was continued by junior lines. The early history
of this family is treated in EYC II pp.75-78.
Clay in 'Early Yorkshire Families', pp.58-59 has this to say:
"MAULEVERER
Not later than 1105 Richard Malus Leporarius gave to Holy Trinity,
York, and the monks of Marmoutier the church of Allerton and a carucate
there, with tithes in other places; and later to increase the
endowments of the priory at Allerton, he gave 7 1/2 carucates in
Grafton, Allerton being made a mother church by the confirmation of
Archbishop Thurstan, 1109-14; among the witnesses to another of his
charters were his brothers Serlo, Helto, Roger, Fulk and Ralph [Cal.
Docs. France, no.1233; EYC II no. 729]. From Richard descended the
Mauleverers of Allerton who continued in the male line to the first
quarter of the 18th century [Glover's Visitation pp.66-68; Complete
Baronage II, 117-8. Farrer noted errors to Glover's pedigree...]
The Mauleverers of Beamsley (about 5 miles west of Skipton), who were
closely connected with the Allerton line, descended from Helto
Mauleverer, who died between 1155 and 1166; it is not impossible
chronologically that he was Helto brother of Richard Mauleverer
mentioned above, but he may have been of a younger generation. With the
consent of his wife and his son William he gave land in Beamsley to
Embsay priory, not later than 1131-1140, and with the consent of
Bilioth his wife 12 bovates in Malham. Beamsley itself was part of the
honour of Skipton and partly of the Percy fee. In 1166 William
Mauleverer held a knight's fee of the old feoffment in of Skipton in
Hellifield, Malham and elsewhere in Craven. From him the descent was in
the male line to Richard Mauleverer of Beamsley, living in 1399, who
died without issue, his eventual heirs being his sisters Alice, wife of
John Middleton of Stockeld, and Thomasine, wife of William Moore of
Otterburn, whose daughter and coheir Elizabeth married Thomas Clapham,
ancestor of the Claphams of Beamsley."
The Mauleverers of Beamsley are treated in detail in EYC VII (Honor of
Skipton), pp114-152. There is a pedigree chart between pp.114/115.
Keats-Rohan in 'Domesday Descendants', p.1038 says of Helto and William
"Mauleverer, Helto
There was a fief of Maulevrier in cant. Caudebec, Seine maritime (Le
Maho, p.30), but Helto was probably named from the Maulevrier fief of
the bishop of Bayeux at Asnières, Calvados. The fee was given by
Richard son of Bishop Samson to Robert, earl of Gloucester (RRAN III,
58). The Maulevriers were tenants of the archbishops of York, of whom
Thomas I and II were relatives of Samson. Helto Maulevrier of Bearnsby
[sic] was one of the brothers of Richard Maulevrier of Allerton,
founder of the priory, who occurs c. 1109-14. Richard's wife was Emma
and his brothers were Serlo, Helto, Roger, Fulk and Ralph; his
seneschal (or dapifer) was William of Barneville, EYC II, pp. 75-77.
Helto Maulevrier died after 1155, leaving a son by his wife Biliolt."
"Mauleverer, William
Son of Helto Mauleverer of Bearnsby [sic] and Biliot. In 1166 William
held one fee de vetere from the honour of Skipton which lay in
Hellifield, par. Long Preston, Otterburn, Hanlith and Markham, all in
par. Kirkby Malham, and Hawkswick, par. Arncliffe."
In each entry 'Bearnsby' should read Beamsley (probably a transcription
error).
Hope this is of some use.
Cheers
Rosie
Alex Maxwell Findlater wrote:
The Mauleverer family descended from Richard Mauleverer of Allerton
Mauleverer, tenant of the Brus fee in Yorkshire, who was living early
in the 12th century. The main branch of this family died out as given
in John's pedigree and was continued by junior lines. The early history
of this family is treated in EYC II pp.75-78.
Clay in 'Early Yorkshire Families', pp.58-59 has this to say:
"MAULEVERER
Not later than 1105 Richard Malus Leporarius gave to Holy Trinity,
York, and the monks of Marmoutier the church of Allerton and a carucate
there, with tithes in other places; and later to increase the
endowments of the priory at Allerton, he gave 7 1/2 carucates in
Grafton, Allerton being made a mother church by the confirmation of
Archbishop Thurstan, 1109-14; among the witnesses to another of his
charters were his brothers Serlo, Helto, Roger, Fulk and Ralph [Cal.
Docs. France, no.1233; EYC II no. 729]. From Richard descended the
Mauleverers of Allerton who continued in the male line to the first
quarter of the 18th century [Glover's Visitation pp.66-68; Complete
Baronage II, 117-8. Farrer noted errors to Glover's pedigree...]
The Mauleverers of Beamsley (about 5 miles west of Skipton), who were
closely connected with the Allerton line, descended from Helto
Mauleverer, who died between 1155 and 1166; it is not impossible
chronologically that he was Helto brother of Richard Mauleverer
mentioned above, but he may have been of a younger generation. With the
consent of his wife and his son William he gave land in Beamsley to
Embsay priory, not later than 1131-1140, and with the consent of
Bilioth his wife 12 bovates in Malham. Beamsley itself was part of the
honour of Skipton and partly of the Percy fee. In 1166 William
Mauleverer held a knight's fee of the old feoffment in of Skipton in
Hellifield, Malham and elsewhere in Craven. From him the descent was in
the male line to Richard Mauleverer of Beamsley, living in 1399, who
died without issue, his eventual heirs being his sisters Alice, wife of
John Middleton of Stockeld, and Thomasine, wife of William Moore of
Otterburn, whose daughter and coheir Elizabeth married Thomas Clapham,
ancestor of the Claphams of Beamsley."
The Mauleverers of Beamsley are treated in detail in EYC VII (Honor of
Skipton), pp114-152. There is a pedigree chart between pp.114/115.
Keats-Rohan in 'Domesday Descendants', p.1038 says of Helto and William
"Mauleverer, Helto
There was a fief of Maulevrier in cant. Caudebec, Seine maritime (Le
Maho, p.30), but Helto was probably named from the Maulevrier fief of
the bishop of Bayeux at Asnières, Calvados. The fee was given by
Richard son of Bishop Samson to Robert, earl of Gloucester (RRAN III,
58). The Maulevriers were tenants of the archbishops of York, of whom
Thomas I and II were relatives of Samson. Helto Maulevrier of Bearnsby
[sic] was one of the brothers of Richard Maulevrier of Allerton,
founder of the priory, who occurs c. 1109-14. Richard's wife was Emma
and his brothers were Serlo, Helto, Roger, Fulk and Ralph; his
seneschal (or dapifer) was William of Barneville, EYC II, pp. 75-77.
Helto Maulevrier died after 1155, leaving a son by his wife Biliolt."
"Mauleverer, William
Son of Helto Mauleverer of Bearnsby [sic] and Biliot. In 1166 William
held one fee de vetere from the honour of Skipton which lay in
Hellifield, par. Long Preston, Otterburn, Hanlith and Markham, all in
par. Kirkby Malham, and Hawkswick, par. Arncliffe."
In each entry 'Bearnsby' should read Beamsley (probably a transcription
error).
Hope this is of some use.
Cheers
Rosie
Alex Maxwell Findlater wrote:
Dear Friends
I am trying to find Mauleverers in the period 1100-1300. I expect that
they might be in Yorkshire, or perhaps Cumberland or Northumberland.
There was a family in Arncliffe (N of Skipton) in the C16, who
apparently descend from a family at Wothersome, which is either in/near
Leeds or near Wetherby. I also found one on SMG mentioned in a Thweng
mortification in the C14.
I would expect references to the family in 1100-1300 in Early Yorkshire
Charters by Clay or in the work of Farrer. Unfortunately I have access
to neither. If anyone has access a look at the index to see if it is
worth my making a long jounrey would be much appreciated.
Very many thanks
Alex
-
Rosie Bevan
Re: Mauleverer 1100-1300
Dear John
The pedigree from the Plea Rolls relates to the Allerton Mauleverer
family.
The wife of the elder Henry was Cecily, daughter of William de
Dunsworth. Presumably the dispute was related to property which
descended to John Mauleverer by inheritance. The Waleys family (CP
XII/2, pp.317-323) occupied Upper Dunsforth held ultimately of the Brus
fee. This particular manor fell to Laderana de Brus, wife of John de
Bellewe who held in chief, on partition of the Brus lands after the
death of Peter de Brus.
The extract you quoted comes from the lengthy IPM of John de Bellewe
(d. 1301) published in Roger Brown (ed.) 'Yorkshire Inquisitions, vol
III' (Yorks. Arch. Soc., 1902), pp.165-178.
Your quote comes from p.176 and says
'John Mauleverer held of the said John de Bella Aqua, of the
inheritance aforesaid, 14 carucates in [Allerton, Clareton, Lylands,
Dunsforth, Little Ouseburn, Hopperton, Horseforth, and Rawdon] in
demesne and service, by the service of one knight's fee, of which the
said John de Mauleverer holds in demesne 7 carucates of land, worth
14l. a year. Richard le Waleys holds of the same John (Mauleverer) 3
carucates of land in Dunsford worth 7l. a year.'
It seems likely that it was this 3 carucates which was the bone of
contention in the plea.
Laderana's inheritance was further partitioned on her husband's death
so that the Mauleverers came under the overlordship of Aucher fitz
Henry, husband of her daughter, Joan.
Cheers
Rosie
John P. Ravilious wrote:
The pedigree from the Plea Rolls relates to the Allerton Mauleverer
family.
The wife of the elder Henry was Cecily, daughter of William de
Dunsworth. Presumably the dispute was related to property which
descended to John Mauleverer by inheritance. The Waleys family (CP
XII/2, pp.317-323) occupied Upper Dunsforth held ultimately of the Brus
fee. This particular manor fell to Laderana de Brus, wife of John de
Bellewe who held in chief, on partition of the Brus lands after the
death of Peter de Brus.
The extract you quoted comes from the lengthy IPM of John de Bellewe
(d. 1301) published in Roger Brown (ed.) 'Yorkshire Inquisitions, vol
III' (Yorks. Arch. Soc., 1902), pp.165-178.
Your quote comes from p.176 and says
'John Mauleverer held of the said John de Bella Aqua, of the
inheritance aforesaid, 14 carucates in [Allerton, Clareton, Lylands,
Dunsforth, Little Ouseburn, Hopperton, Horseforth, and Rawdon] in
demesne and service, by the service of one knight's fee, of which the
said John de Mauleverer holds in demesne 7 carucates of land, worth
14l. a year. Richard le Waleys holds of the same John (Mauleverer) 3
carucates of land in Dunsford worth 7l. a year.'
It seems likely that it was this 3 carucates which was the bone of
contention in the plea.
Laderana's inheritance was further partitioned on her husband's death
so that the Mauleverers came under the overlordship of Aucher fitz
Henry, husband of her daughter, Joan.
Cheers
Rosie
John P. Ravilious wrote:
[duplicate message]
Saturday, 14 October, 2006
Dear Alex,
There is an interesting pedigree given in Wrottesley's
Pedigrees from the Plea Rolls which hopefully will lead to
resolving (part of) the Mauleverer problem. The full entry,
from late 1327, traces two Mauleverer branches back to ca.
1189-1199 ("temp. King Richard"), and reads as follows:
" De Banco, Mich., 20 E. II,. m. 195.
Ebor. - John Mauleverer sued Richard, son of Stephen
Walays, of Helagh, for eighteen messuages, two mills,
and twenty-four bovates of land, etc., in Nether
Dunsford and Over Dunsford. The pleadings give
this pedigree:
_____________________________________
I I
Ralph, temp. King Richard. Henry.
I I
I I
William. Richard.
_______I_______________ I
I I I
Robert, Joan, Henry.
ob. s.p. ob. s.p. I
I
John.
I
I
John Mauleverer,
the plaintiff. " [1]
The land in dispute in 1327 was located in what is now known
as Over Dunsforth and Lower Dunsforth, Aldborough, W.R. Yorkshire.
The other related document I note is given below, from the
Calendar of Close Rolls, dated at York, 26 Aug. 1327 - which
relates indirectly to the land in Yorkshire in dispute above.
' Enrolment of indenture made between Sir William de Kyme
and Sir Richard Waleys at York, on 17 August, 1 Edward
III., witnessing that whereas Richard has made two
recognisances to William in chancery, one for 400l. and
the other for 300l., William grants that the recognisance
for the former sum shall be cancelled if Richard enfeoff
Stephen, his son and heir, and Annora (Anore), daughter of
Richard de Umframvill, late earl of Anegos, of the manor
of Burghwaleys before Christmas next, to have to them
and the heirs of the bodies, with reversion to Richard and
his heirs, and if Richard do not alienate the manors of
Neuton Waleys, Over Dunsford, and Nether Dunsford, and do
not divest himself of the manors hereafter, whereby
Stephen and Annora or the heirs of their bodies shall be
disturbed after Richard's death from entering and holding
the said manors as of Stephen's inheritance. William
also grants that the other recognisance shall be annulled
if Richard pay to him the 200 marks that he received
for the marriage of Stephen and Annora within a year after
Annora's death, in case she die within a year of the making
of this indenture. Richard agrees that the recognisances
shall remain in effect if he do not fulfill the conditions
aforesaid.
Memorandum, that William and Richard came into
chancery at York, on the said day, and acknowledge the
above deed. ' [2]
There is some record partially visible via Google Books in a
volume of YAJ (either Yorkshire Archaeological, or Yorkshire Arch.
and Topographical Assn - unclear which vol. or year) where on
p. 176 of that volume an entry records,
' John Mauleverer held of the said John de Bella aqua, of the
inheritance aforesaid, 14 carucates in Allerton,......, Dunsforth,
Little Ouseburn, Hopperton,.... '
Perhaps further venturesome queries into Google will find the
elusive volume. Hope the foregoing is helpful.
Cheers,
John
NOTES
[1] Gen. the Honourable George Wrottesley, Pedigrees from the
Plea Rolls (The Antiquary, January-June 1890), XXI:102.
oddly enough, currently accessible via GoogleBooks:
http://books.google.com/books?vid=LCCN0 ... ISO-8859-1
[2] CCR 1 Edw. III (1327-1330), p. 220, mem. 15d.
also accessible,
http://books.google.com/books?vid=0KrGv ... ISO-8859-1
* John P. Ravilious
Alex Maxwell Findlater wrote:
Dear Friends
I am trying to find Mauleverers in the period 1100-1300. I expect that
they might be in Yorkshire, or perhaps Cumberland or Northumberland.
There was a family in Arncliffe (N of Skipton) in the C16, who
apparently descend from a family at Wothersome, which is either in/near
Leeds or near Wetherby. I also found one on SMG mentioned in a Thweng
mortification in the C14.
I would expect references to the family in 1100-1300 in Early Yorkshire
Charters by Clay or in the work of Farrer. Unfortunately I have access
to neither. If anyone has access a look at the index to see if it is
worth my making a long jounrey would be much appreciated.
Very many thanks
Alex
-
Alex Maxwell Findlater
Re: Mauleverer 1100-1300
Dear Rosie
Thank you very much. In fact I managed to get up to London and made
time to get to the BL and was able to see Farrar, which is on the open
shelves there. Unfortunately the later Clay volumes are all held at
York, so two days away.
I do very much appreciate your help.
Alex
Thank you very much. In fact I managed to get up to London and made
time to get to the BL and was able to see Farrar, which is on the open
shelves there. Unfortunately the later Clay volumes are all held at
York, so two days away.
I do very much appreciate your help.
Alex
-
Tim Powys-Lybbe
EYC (was Re: Mauleverer 1100-1300)
In message of 19 Oct, "Alex Maxwell Findlater"
<maxwellfindlater@hotmail.com> wrote:
The complete EYC 12 vols are in the Society of Genealogists library in
the City:
http://www.sog.org.uk/sogcat/access
and do a Main Title (MTI) search for Early Yorkshire Charters.
--
Tim Powys-Lybbe tim@powys.org
For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/
<maxwellfindlater@hotmail.com> wrote:
In fact I managed to get up to London and made time to get to the BL
and was able to see Farrar, which is on the open shelves there.
Unfortunately the later Clay volumes are all held at York, so two days
away.
The complete EYC 12 vols are in the Society of Genealogists library in
the City:
http://www.sog.org.uk/sogcat/access
and do a Main Title (MTI) search for Early Yorkshire Charters.
--
Tim Powys-Lybbe tim@powys.org
For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/