Extra generation in Fitzalan line?

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
W David Samuelsen

Extra generation in Fitzalan line?

Legg inn av W David Samuelsen » 24 jan 2006 03:01:01

Noticed the conflict and need to ask you to inform which one is correct.

Eleanor FitzAlan (abt 1283), wife of Henry Percy (1273)
daughter of Richard Fitzalan (3 Feb 1267) and Alisona De Saluzzo

Richard Fitzalan son of John FitzAlan and Isabella de Mortimer

- or is it this line?

Eleanor FitzAlan (abt 1283), wife of Henry Percy (1273)
daughter of John FitzAlan (1246) and Isabella de Mortimer
completely omitted Richard FitzAlan and Alisona de Saluzzo

Please don't quibble over the spellings and whatsnots. Just this one
question that needs to be answered.

W. David Samuelsen

Chris Phillips

Re: Extra generation in Fitzalan line?

Legg inn av Chris Phillips » 24 jan 2006 10:35:34

W. David Samuelsen wrote:
Noticed the conflict and need to ask you to inform which one is correct.

Eleanor FitzAlan (abt 1283), wife of Henry Percy (1273)
daughter of Richard Fitzalan (3 Feb 1267) and Alisona De Saluzzo

Richard Fitzalan son of John FitzAlan and Isabella de Mortimer

- or is it this line?

Eleanor FitzAlan (abt 1283), wife of Henry Percy (1273)
daughter of John FitzAlan (1246) and Isabella de Mortimer
completely omitted Richard FitzAlan and Alisona de Saluzzo


The only direct contemporary evidence is that Eleanor was the sister and
executrix of one Sir Richard de Arundel (d. 1314). Monasic sources call her
the daughter of the earl of Arundel, and Douglas Richardson posted details
of a recognizance owed to Henry by earl Richard (d. 1301/2) in 1300, perhaps
representing her dowry. These tend to support your first version:
http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/cp/p_percy.shtml

Chris Phillips

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»