Breaking the line John, 6th Lord Lovell --->> John Broughton

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Gjest

Breaking the line John, 6th Lord Lovell --->> John Broughton

Legg inn av Gjest » 29 des 2005 00:56:02

John Broughton b 16 Nov 1512 (http://www.genealogics.org)
son of
Anne Sapcote d 14 Mar 1558/9 (http://www.genealogics.org)
daughter of
Sir Guy Sapcote of Huntingdon
son of
Sir William Sapcote and Ann Semark (or St Mark) d 1 Aug 1510
son of
Elizabeth Dinham d 19 Oct 1516 and John Sapcote d 5 Jan 1500/1
(http://www.stirnet.com "Dinham")
daughter of
John Dinham of Hartland d 25 Jan 1457/1458 (http://www.genealogics.org)
son of
Phillipa Lovell d 15 May 1465 (http://www.stirnet.com "Dinham") and John, 4th Lord
Dinham b 1359
daughter of
John, 6th Lord Lovell d 19 Oct 1414 (http://www.genealogics.org)

Could Phillipa here be the daughter of John FIFTH Lord Dinham ?
There is not enough time in this line for John Broughton to be born in 1512
In particular
John, 6th Lord Lovell b 1369/77
Philippa Lovell b 1386/93
John Dinham b 1404/6
Elizabeth Dinham b 1421/53
Sir WIlliam Sapcote b 1434/66
Sir Guy Sapcote b 1451/83
Anne Sapcote b 1482/1500
John Broughton b 1512

This line does work EXCEPT Elizabeth Dinham was the widow of Fulk Bouchier,
2nd Lord Fitzwarin *when* she married John Sapcote. Fulk did not die until
1479, so Sir William Sapcote cannot be Elizabeth Dinham's son .... Or what other
alternative is there.

Will Johnson

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»