I thank you one and all for the kind and gracious
defense of myself.
Ordinarily, I would leave private missives private.
However, since Mr. Bulkeley has seen fit to send me a
public message in spiteful, boorish, arrogant
manner, I have no compunctions or qualms about showing
him for the swinish lout he is.
K
--- Kay Allen <allenk@pacbell.net> wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kay Allen <allenk@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: Bulkley of Woore
To: paul bulkley <designeconomic@yahoo.com
Since you are not interested in the Bulkeley of
Woore
line, then I don't have to feel badly about not
having
the material at hand.
You may not realize it, but you come across as a
pompous, rude know-it-all.
I have been working on genealogy for over 35 years,
have a baccalaureate degree in social science, and
have proudly earned the appellation of Accredited
Genealogist (R). I have been, until the untimely
passing of my husband, a regular, valued contributor
of this list. I do not appreciate the overly brash,
dismissive tone of your missive.
You may not have intended it, but that is my
perception.
Kay Allen
--- paul bulkley <designeconomic@yahoo.com> wrote:
I cannot recollect commenting on your domestic
arrangements.
I simply indicated that if you retrieved your
records,
perhaps we could exchange information.
To be quite blunt I am not in the least interested
in
the Bulkley of Woore line. I am simply trying to
improve the understanding of a line which all
acquainted seem incapable of solving.
Sincerely Yours,
Paul Bulkley
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com