Thank you, Peter. I should have made clear my question was rhetorical.
Trying to wade through these ancient enmities would take more time than
I have available, and would I suspect not be edifying. I can only hope
that this public airing avails someone some benefit somewhere, sometime.
Many of us however remain merely burdened by it all.
T.
"Peter Stewart" <p_m_stewart@msn.com> 09/16/05 06:36PM
""Tony Hoskins"" <hoskins@sonoma.lib.ca.us> wrote in message
news:s32afd73.024@CENTRAL_SVR2...
At this desperate juncture the Walrus might well observe:
"I am you and I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all
together."
Words to savor and ponder.
(Am I the only one who hasn't a clue what they're on about?).
If you look on Google Groups, you can follow a thread despite any
changes of
subject line.
And if you don't want an answer to a question, it's advisable not to
ask it
on an Internet forum. Rhetoric is in oversupply here already.
Peter Stewart