Fw: Fw: Royalty for Commoners OT

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Fw: Fw: Royalty for Commoners OT

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 15 sep 2005 23:56:03

----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com>
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Royalty for Commoners OT
<snip>

What's going on with Michael Welch? Truthfully, he's very disappointed
by what you did, that's what. He's also very angry with you. He says
you professed to be his friend with one hand, and then stabbed him in
the back with the other.

What is actually going on is that Richardson may have deceived Mike Welch in

the first place.
Mike is a very descent and honest person, who calls a spade a spade. If his
trust has been betrayed by Richardson in the first place, the outcome can
only be blamed on Richardson.
If Richardson spreads mis-information only he himself is to blame if it
comes to haunt him.

Whatever Mike Welch may have said to me, isn't this betraying _your_ private
e-mails? This game works both ways. Your hounding Peter Stewart with is
Peter Stewart Peter Stewart and then that diversion PMS is tasteless and
does not belong on gen-med. And if Mike Welch can help to stop this
nonsense, he should and, I believe, he has tried but it is Richardson who
ploughs on and on. The fall out can only be blamed on one person : Douglas
Richardson.

Peter Stewart

Re: Fw: Royalty for Commoners OT

Legg inn av Peter Stewart » 15 sep 2005 23:56:04

""Leo van de Pas"" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:00b401c5ba40$2db88d70$0300a8c0@Toshiba...
----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Royalty for Commoners OT
snip


What's going on with Michael Welch? Truthfully, he's very disappointed
by what you did, that's what. He's also very angry with you. He says
you professed to be his friend with one hand, and then stabbed him in
the back with the other.

What is actually going on is that Richardson may have deceived Mike Welch
in the first place.
Mike is a very descent and honest person, who calls a spade a spade. If
his trust has been betrayed by Richardson in the first place, the outcome
can only be blamed on Richardson.
If Richardson spreads mis-information only he himself is to blame if it
comes to haunt him.

Whatever Mike Welch may have said to me, isn't this betraying _your_
private e-mails? This game works both ways. Your hounding Peter Stewart
with is Peter Stewart Peter Stewart and then that diversion PMS is
tasteless and does not belong on gen-med. And if Mike Welch can help to
stop this nonsense, he should and, I believe, he has tried but it is
Richardson who ploughs on and on. The fall out can only be blamed on one
person : Douglas Richardson.

Well said, Leo.

The line taken by Richardson above, purportedly on behalf of Welch, is
compromising to them both: he is confessing by implication that his lie
passed on by Welch to Leo was meant to go no further.

The claim that "Uriah" was a real person, and corresponding with Richardson
from Turkey while somehow not able to get an e-mail through to the
newsgroup, is hardly something that the recipient could consider secret,
especially when the matter is only being discussed at all because the huge
credibility problem is already in a public arena.

It was a feeble lie that Richardson started, and that Welch loyally passed
along for him; and since after weeks of storming what passes for his brain
Richardson is still unable to suggest any plausible explanation, he has
resorted instead to unwarranted & deeply foolish attacks on Leo.

The only manure in this thread comes from Salt Lake City, and the only
digging is an attempt by Richardson to excavate his way through the earth
from there to Turkey. He is getting to a record depth, even by his own low
standards.

Peter Stewart

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»