"You probably read about the surgical method by which the murders were
done, this dopey Duke had no medical knowledge to do it himself. He may
have caused it but did not do it, nor asked for it to be done."
Leo van de Pas
------------------------
Errant Twaddle!
DSH
| Why couldn't Lord Randolph Churchill (and others)
| be involved in a cover up [sic] to protect the monarchy?
Leo van de Pas
----------------
Hilarious!
Leo has now become a rampant conspiracy addict.
Let's see his evidence that Lord Randolph Churchill was involved in a
coverup of the Jack the Ripper murders in Whitechapel in order "to
protect the monarchy."
The burden of proof is on Leo van de Pas when he indulges in such wild
fantasies.
In his desperation, realizing he had made a very foolish statement, Leo
insisted I must prove who the Real Jack The Ripper was.
No Sale.
If Leo reads a demagogic book, swallows it hook, line and sinker and
then babbles about it on USENET -- defending the thesis of the writer --
as he has above -- he bears responsibility for his own words -- and will
be held to account.
DSH
Jack The Ripper
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
-
Peter Stewart
Re: Jack The Ripper
The identity of "Jack the Ripper" is one of the perennial favourite topics
of extreme bores.
Hines is obviously one of these, persistent and senseless, absorbed in this
tedious, unrpoductive study and insensitive to the soporific effect this has
on balanced minds.
This from Hines is precisely the kind of self-indulgent junk that a
moderated newsgroup will filter out. Bring it on.
Peter Stewart
"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0ssSe.797$Bv2.4851@eagle.america.net...
of extreme bores.
Hines is obviously one of these, persistent and senseless, absorbed in this
tedious, unrpoductive study and insensitive to the soporific effect this has
on balanced minds.
This from Hines is precisely the kind of self-indulgent junk that a
moderated newsgroup will filter out. Bring it on.
Peter Stewart
"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0ssSe.797$Bv2.4851@eagle.america.net...
"You probably read about the surgical method by which the murders were
done, this dopey Duke had no medical knowledge to do it himself. He may
have caused it but did not do it, nor asked for it to be done."
Leo van de Pas
------------------------
Errant Twaddle!
DSH
| Why couldn't Lord Randolph Churchill (and others)
| be involved in a cover up [sic] to protect the monarchy?
Leo van de Pas
----------------
Hilarious!
Leo has now become a rampant conspiracy addict.
Let's see his evidence that Lord Randolph Churchill was involved in a
coverup of the Jack the Ripper murders in Whitechapel in order "to
protect the monarchy."
The burden of proof is on Leo van de Pas when he indulges in such wild
fantasies.
In his desperation, realizing he had made a very foolish statement, Leo
insisted I must prove who the Real Jack The Ripper was.
No Sale.
If Leo reads a demagogic book, swallows it hook, line and sinker and
then babbles about it on USENET -- defending the thesis of the writer --
as he has above -- he bears responsibility for his own words -- and will
be held to account.
DSH
-
Peter Stewart
Re: Jack The Ripper
Leo is NOT the "fellow" who is trying to bore everone senseless by ranting
on about this OT subject.
Peter Stewart
"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pRsSe.798$Bv2.4857@eagle.america.net...
on about this OT subject.
Peter Stewart
"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pRsSe.798$Bv2.4857@eagle.america.net...
Leo van de Pas is the fellow who raised the issue of the real identity
of Jack The Ripper -- not I.
DSH
-
D. Spencer Hines
Re: Jack The Ripper
Leo van de Pas is the fellow who raised the issue of the real identity
of Jack The Ripper -- not I.
DSH
of Jack The Ripper -- not I.
DSH
-
Richard Smyth at Road Run
Re: Jack The Ripper
D. Spencer Hines writes:
""The final happiness of man consists in the contemplation of truth....
This is sought for its own sake, and is directed to no other end beyond
itself." Saint Thomas Aquinas, [1224/5-1274] "Summa Contra Gentiles"
[c.1258-1264]"
On Leo's behalf, I reply to your Aquinas card with our Kant card, which trumps:
"In Absicht der Glueckseligkeit glaubt endlich doch jedermann, die groesste Summe . . . der Annehmlichkeit des Lebens ein wahres, ja sogar das hoechste Gut nennen zu koennen. Allein auch dawider straeubt sich die Vernunft. Annehmlichkeit ist Genuss. Ist es aber auf diesen allein angelegt, so waere es thoeright, scrupulos in Ansehung der Mittel zu sein, . . . Nur durch das, was er thut ohne Ruecksicht auf Genuss, in voller Freiheit und unabhaengig von dem, was ihm die Natur auch leidend verschaffen koente, giebt er seinem Dasein als der Existenz einer Person einen absoluten Werth; und die Glueckseligkeit ist mit der ganzen Fuelle ihrer Annehmlichkeit bei weitem nicht ein unbedington Gut." (Akad. 5:208-9)
Which roughly translates as: Trolls who wish to make it a question of happiness when it should be a question of truth are morally worthless human beings.
Oh! Wait! I forgot I lost the truth game to Peter. Never mind.
Regards,
Richard Smyth
smyth@nc.rr.com
""The final happiness of man consists in the contemplation of truth....
This is sought for its own sake, and is directed to no other end beyond
itself." Saint Thomas Aquinas, [1224/5-1274] "Summa Contra Gentiles"
[c.1258-1264]"
On Leo's behalf, I reply to your Aquinas card with our Kant card, which trumps:
"In Absicht der Glueckseligkeit glaubt endlich doch jedermann, die groesste Summe . . . der Annehmlichkeit des Lebens ein wahres, ja sogar das hoechste Gut nennen zu koennen. Allein auch dawider straeubt sich die Vernunft. Annehmlichkeit ist Genuss. Ist es aber auf diesen allein angelegt, so waere es thoeright, scrupulos in Ansehung der Mittel zu sein, . . . Nur durch das, was er thut ohne Ruecksicht auf Genuss, in voller Freiheit und unabhaengig von dem, was ihm die Natur auch leidend verschaffen koente, giebt er seinem Dasein als der Existenz einer Person einen absoluten Werth; und die Glueckseligkeit ist mit der ganzen Fuelle ihrer Annehmlichkeit bei weitem nicht ein unbedington Gut." (Akad. 5:208-9)
Which roughly translates as: Trolls who wish to make it a question of happiness when it should be a question of truth are morally worthless human beings.
Oh! Wait! I forgot I lost the truth game to Peter. Never mind.
Regards,
Richard Smyth
smyth@nc.rr.com