Moderated Mediaeval Genealogy Pipedreams

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
D. Spencer Hines

Moderated Mediaeval Genealogy Pipedreams

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 04 sep 2005 03:24:02

Pogue Stewart Amusingly Pontificates:

"Why? Again, I simply can't understand the premise of entitlement, that
you now extend to IMMEDIACY of messages apeparing. [sic] What is the
problem of once-a-day checking by a single moderator, releasing all the
appropriate messages on a subject? How will the moderated newsgroup be
as busy as this one, given that people will know not to waste time &
bandwidth with OT posts, genealogically contentl-free [sic] messages of
"thanks" etc, and glib nonsense. SGM in any case has only around a
dozen worthwhile messages on an average GOOD day. A moderator hear
could save a lot of further whole threads just by sending a form notice
"look it up in the archive" to people raising questions. The threads
and messages of substance are only a proportion of the activity...."

"I understand that the FMG proposal involves several separate subject
areas with different moderators for each, and this will also help to
keep them less stretched. I pity whoever takes on the English nobility &
gentry of the Plantagent [sic] era. But I won't be looking at that site
very often or troubling the moderator/s on topics discussed there."

Peter Stewart

[Additional mindless blather has been snipped.]
---------------------------------

Mindless Pipedreams From Pogue Stewart.

Never Happen.

He's gone VERY quiet about Jack The Ripper -- having gotten his arse
soundly kicked on that one.

Hightailing it for the tall grass.

Pogue Stewart should volunteer to be the "moderator".

Virginia, it just doesn't get any better than this.

I've never seen an Australian make such a fool of himself -- with one
exception -- and that one was actually a Tasmanian -- so a special case
of gross incompetence, combined with a vicious nature.

Australians are usually FAR more sensible.

DSH

Peter Stewart

Re: Moderated Mediaeval Genealogy Pipedreams

Legg inn av Peter Stewart » 04 sep 2005 03:24:03

"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Q%rSe.795$Bv2.4823@eagle.america.net...

<snip>

He's gone VERY quiet about Jack The Ripper -- having gotten his arse
soundly kicked on that one.

Hightailing it for the tall grass.

There's nothing further needing to be said about the "Jack the Ripper"
nonsense - Hines has merely repeated the deliberate mischaracterisation of
Leo's reports from a book by someone else as being his own opinions. I am
not going to indulge him in this.

Peter Stewart

Peter Stewart

Re: Moderated Mediaeval Genealogy Pipedreams

Legg inn av Peter Stewart » 04 sep 2005 03:32:40

"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Q%rSe.795$Bv2.4823@eagle.america.net...
Pogue Stewart Amusingly Pontificates:

"Why? Again, I simply can't understand the premise of entitlement, that
you now extend to IMMEDIACY of messages apeparing. [sic] What is the
problem of once-a-day checking by a single moderator, releasing all the
appropriate messages on a subject? How will the moderated newsgroup be
as busy as this one, given that people will know not to waste time &
bandwidth with OT posts, genealogically contentl-free [sic] messages of
"thanks" etc, and glib nonsense. SGM in any case has only around a
dozen worthwhile messages on an average GOOD day. A moderator hear
could save a lot of further whole threads just by sending a form notice
"look it up in the archive" to people raising questions. The threads
and messages of substance are only a proportion of the activity...."

"I understand that the FMG proposal involves several separate subject
areas with different moderators for each, and this will also help to
keep them less stretched. I pity whoever takes on the English nobility &
gentry of the Plantagent [sic] era. But I won't be looking at that site
very often or troubling the moderator/s on topics discussed there."

Peter Stewart

[Additional mindless blather has been snipped.]
---------------------------------

Mindless Pipedreams From Pogue Stewart.

Never Happen.

As usual, Hines has failed to pick up on the discussion before barging in -
the thing is being planned right now, and there's no reason to suppose it
will never eventuate.

By the way, I have no intention of putting myself forward as a moderator.
Apart from lacking suitability - or indeed credibility - for such a role, I
don't have the time or inclination for it.

If I was moderating a discussion, this post and the one from Hines that I am
responding to would not have appeared anyway.

And whenever Hines, Richardson, Brandon or anyone else tried to misrepresent
others, characterising their statements falsely or arbitrarily, without any
attempt at giving a rational response, and evading any legitimate issues
raised, all that might appear on the newsgroup would be a brief notice from
the moderator advising the readers that inadequate post/s in reply from
these goons had been withheld.

Peter Stewart

D. Spencer Hines

Re: Moderated Mediaeval Genealogy Pipedreams

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 04 sep 2005 03:48:01

Pogue Stewart Amusingly Pontificates:

"Why? Again, I simply can't understand the premise of entitlement, that
you now extend to IMMEDIACY of messages apeparing. [sic] What is the
problem of once-a-day checking by a single moderator, releasing all the
appropriate messages on a subject? How will the moderated newsgroup be
as busy as this one, given that people will know not to waste time &
bandwidth with OT posts, genealogically contentl-free [sic] messages of
"thanks" etc, and glib nonsense. SGM in any case has only around a
dozen worthwhile messages on an average GOOD day. A moderator hear
could save a lot of further whole threads just by sending a form notice
"look it up in the archive" to people raising questions. The threads
and messages of substance are only a proportion of the activity...."

"I understand that the FMG proposal involves several separate subject
areas with different moderators for each, and this will also help to
keep them less stretched. I pity whoever takes on the English nobility &
gentry of the Plantagent [sic] era. But I won't be looking at that site
very often or troubling the moderator/s on topics discussed there."

Peter Stewart

[Additional mindless blather has been snipped.]
---------------------------------

Mindless Pipedreams From Pogue Stewart.

Never Happen.

He's gone VERY quiet about Jack The Ripper -- having gotten his arse
soundly kicked on that one.

Hightailing it for the tall grass.

Pogue Stewart should volunteer to be the "moderator".

Virginia, it just doesn't get any better than this.

I've never seen an Australian make such a fool of himself -- with one
exception -- and that one was actually a Tasmanian -- so a special case
of gross incompetence, combined with a vicious nature.

Australians are usually FAR more sensible.

DSH

D. Spencer Hines

Re: Moderated Mediaeval Genealogy Pipedreams

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 04 sep 2005 05:03:49

Pogue Stewart Babbles And Blunders On....

Hilarious!

He wants to create a lot of work for a "MODERATOR" -- but he has no
intention of serving himself.

Further, what he actually wants to do is CENSOR certain individuals who
kick him in the arse and make him look nakedly foolish -- when he indeed
does something decidedly foolish...

As he does so often.

Yep, this Pogue Stewart is a remarkably atypical Australian -- all
blunder, babble and balderdash and no balls -- but with a VERY thin
skin.

But simply DELIGHTFUL as Entertainment.

DSH

"Peter Stewart" <p_m_stewart@msn.com> wrote in message
news:c1tSe.21548$FA3.1409@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

| By the way, I have no intention of putting myself forward as a
moderator.
| Apart from lacking suitability - or indeed credibility - for such a
role, I
| don't have the time or inclination for it.
|
| If I was moderating a discussion, this post and the one from Hines
that I am
| responding to would not have appeared anyway.
|
| And whenever Hines, Richardson, Brandon or anyone else tried to
misrepresent
| others, characterising their statements falsely or arbitrarily,
without any
| attempt at giving a rational response, and evading any legitimate
issues
| raised, all that might appear on the newsgroup would be a brief notice
from
| the moderator advising the readers that inadequate post/s in reply
from
| these goons had been withheld.
|
| Peter Stewart

Peter Stewart

Re: Moderated Mediaeval Genealogy Pipedreams

Legg inn av Peter Stewart » 04 sep 2005 05:06:38

"D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HGtSe.800$Bv2.4877@eagle.america.net...
Pogue Stewart Babbles And Blunders On....

Hilarious!

He wants to create a lot of work for a "MODERATOR" -- but he has no
intention of serving himself.

I don't want to create ANY work for a moderator - the main object of setting
up a moderated alternative to SGM is to provide a civilised forum where the
offenses that START flames will not be allowed, from anyone.

Further, what he actually wants to do is CENSOR certain individuals who
kick him in the arse and make him look nakedly foolish -- when he indeed
does something decidedly foolish...

No, as I've said already the approach should be to moderate content, not
authorship.

As he does so often.

Maybe, but notably Hines NEVER manages to pick these occasions, and hence he
invariably ends up as he starts out, looking entirely foolish, because there
is NO substance or intellectual heft whatever behind his provocative posts.

Yep, this Pogue Stewart is a remarkably atypical Australian -- all
blunder, babble and balderdash and no balls -- but with a VERY thin
skin.

Precisely & absolutely wrong, as everyone can see for themselves. The oafish
jibes of Hines miss the mark anyway, but my skin has been demonstrably
impervious to his fabricated nonsense ever since he turned his attentions on
me to avoid admitting he doesn't know Latin (remember the hopeless hash he
made of "non sequitur").

Now he is aghast at the possibility of losing the people he has devoted
himself to making into adversaries. Anyone who was enlightened by Paul
Reed's post describing Narcissistic Personality Disorder from the diagnostic
manual, hitting Richardson off exactly, may be amused to consider these
variants, that just as neatly cover Hines and Brandon:

"Histrionic Personality Disorder. Histrionic patients are also attention
seeking, but the attention they seek does not need to be admiring. They are
more highly emotional and seductive compared to patients with NPD."

and

"Borderline Personality Disorder. These patients also tend to idealize and
devalue others, but narcissistic patients lack the unstable identity,
self-destructive behavior, and abandonment fears that characterize
borderline patients."
Soon this pair of galoots may be abandoned on SGM to put up with each
other's histrionics. Hellish.

Peter Stewart



But simply DELIGHTFUL as Entertainment.

DSH

"Peter Stewart" <p_m_stewart@msn.com> wrote in message
news:c1tSe.21548$FA3.1409@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

| By the way, I have no intention of putting myself forward as a
moderator.
| Apart from lacking suitability - or indeed credibility - for such a
role, I
| don't have the time or inclination for it.
|
| If I was moderating a discussion, this post and the one from Hines
that I am
| responding to would not have appeared anyway.
|
| And whenever Hines, Richardson, Brandon or anyone else tried to
misrepresent
| others, characterising their statements falsely or arbitrarily,
without any
| attempt at giving a rational response, and evading any legitimate
issues
| raised, all that might appear on the newsgroup would be a brief notice
from
| the moderator advising the readers that inadequate post/s in reply
from
| these goons had been withheld.
|
| Peter Stewart

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»