This site http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com ... s_003.html
QUOTE
In a description of St. Lawrence Church in "History of Buckinghamshire" there
is a reference to Elizabeth Hussey Hungerford Throckmorton :
"At the east end of the floor of the south aisle is the brass figure of a
lady in an embroidered gown with slashed sleeves, the head missing. Beneath is
an inscription to Elizabeth Hussey [died 1553[, daughter of Lord Hussey,
married Walter Hungerford and married second Robert Throckmorton. There are also a
group of five daughters and four shields of arms: [1] Throckmorton, [2]
Hussey, [3] Throckmorton with six quarterlings impaling Hussey and Fortescue and
[4] Hungerford impaling Hussey."
Elizabeth Hussey Hungerford Throckmorton died January 23, 1571-72 and was
buried at Weston Underwood, Buckinghamshire, according to "Lincolnshire
Pedigrees," thought be a more reliable source particularly in view of 11 children
being born after 1545. Descendants are unknown.
ENDQUOTE
It seems to make sense that if she had eleven children aft 1545, then she
could not have died in 1553. The 1571/2 date makes more sense.
Will Johnson
Robert Throckmorton d 1570 / Elizabeth Hussey d ??
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
-
Rick Eaton
Re: Robert Throckmorton d 1570 / Elizabeth Hussey d ??
To all sniffing around the Husseys of the 16th century, please, please, if
you come across a solid reference to a Jane Hussey [uncertain date of death
in the late 1580s but buried at St. James Church, Dover, Kent reputed
daughter of Thomas Hussey] please, please pass it on.
I may have posted about her in the recent past. So, if I am repeating
myself, please qaccept my apologies. She was the wife of WILLIAM Eaton II of
Dover, a merchant, ship owner and one of the "heads" of the Cinque Ports.
"Rick Eaton" eaton.noble@sbcglobal.net
you come across a solid reference to a Jane Hussey [uncertain date of death
in the late 1580s but buried at St. James Church, Dover, Kent reputed
daughter of Thomas Hussey] please, please pass it on.
I may have posted about her in the recent past. So, if I am repeating
myself, please qaccept my apologies. She was the wife of WILLIAM Eaton II of
Dover, a merchant, ship owner and one of the "heads" of the Cinque Ports.
"Rick Eaton" eaton.noble@sbcglobal.net
-
Gjest
Re: Robert Throckmorton d 1570 / Elizabeth Hussey d ??
In a message dated 8/30/05 9:47:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
eaton.noble@sbcglobal.net writes:
<< To all sniffing around the Husseys of the 16th century, please, please, if
you come across a solid reference to a Jane Hussey >>
Rick et al. My postings to this list are only secondary to my research file
which I regularly update to http://www.ancestry.com 's Ancestral World Tree project.
So whatever I find, including sources, notes, etc. is posted there as well
as here. And more there than here.
I had posted my research previously to the Pedigree Resource File on
http://www.familysearch.org and that was a mistake. They list your address on the site and
so I'd get people looking me up in the phone book and calling me at 8 in the
morning or 10 at night to want to discuss some person who I had idly included in
my research. I frequently include everyone of a certain surname in a certain
area, when I'm researching a family, because I don't want to have to go back
and repeat research. You never know when that John Browning might end up
being the cousin of the Peter Browning you're looking for, and might provide
useful details.
At any rate, my point was, sometimes the Ancestral World Tree is very useful.
Some researchers give quite copious notes within their trees. Most do not
of course, but then that's why people pay for other's to do their work for them!
Will Johnson, Professional Genealogist
eaton.noble@sbcglobal.net writes:
<< To all sniffing around the Husseys of the 16th century, please, please, if
you come across a solid reference to a Jane Hussey >>
Rick et al. My postings to this list are only secondary to my research file
which I regularly update to http://www.ancestry.com 's Ancestral World Tree project.
So whatever I find, including sources, notes, etc. is posted there as well
as here. And more there than here.
I had posted my research previously to the Pedigree Resource File on
http://www.familysearch.org and that was a mistake. They list your address on the site and
so I'd get people looking me up in the phone book and calling me at 8 in the
morning or 10 at night to want to discuss some person who I had idly included in
my research. I frequently include everyone of a certain surname in a certain
area, when I'm researching a family, because I don't want to have to go back
and repeat research. You never know when that John Browning might end up
being the cousin of the Peter Browning you're looking for, and might provide
useful details.
At any rate, my point was, sometimes the Ancestral World Tree is very useful.
Some researchers give quite copious notes within their trees. Most do not
of course, but then that's why people pay for other's to do their work for them!
Will Johnson, Professional Genealogist
-
Pat Bausman
Re: Robert Throckmorton d 1570 / Elizabeth Hussey d ??
<snip> >>>My postings to this list are only secondary to my research
file
which I regularly update to http://www.ancestry.com 's Ancestral World Tree
project.<snip>>>>
Hello Will,
Can you tell me the name or number of your ancestry.com database? (And,
doesn't it also appear under the same name/number on RootsWeb's
WorldConnect?) I always appreciate those that have something more than
just regurgitated GEDCOMs.
Another problem with posting to Pedigree Resource File is that you
can't update or correct your submissions; you just have to resubmit
another database and hope users know which is right.
Thanks, Pat Bausman
file
which I regularly update to http://www.ancestry.com 's Ancestral World Tree
project.<snip>>>>
Hello Will,
Can you tell me the name or number of your ancestry.com database? (And,
doesn't it also appear under the same name/number on RootsWeb's
WorldConnect?) I always appreciate those that have something more than
just regurgitated GEDCOMs.
Another problem with posting to Pedigree Resource File is that you
can't update or correct your submissions; you just have to resubmit
another database and hope users know which is right.
Thanks, Pat Bausman
-
Richard C. Browning, Jr.
RE: Robert Throckmorton d 1570 / Elizabeth Hussey d ??
Will,
How can your research file on ancestry.com be accessed. I would be interested in looking
at it. I am curious about your reference to the Brownings.
Richard C. Browning, Jr.
Grand Prairie, TX
How can your research file on ancestry.com be accessed. I would be interested in looking
at it. I am curious about your reference to the Brownings.
Richard C. Browning, Jr.
Grand Prairie, TX
-----Original Message-----
From: WJhonson@aol.com [mailto:WJhonson@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 17:05
To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: Robert Throckmorton d 1570 / Elizabeth Hussey d ??
In a message dated 8/30/05 9:47:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
eaton.noble@sbcglobal.net writes:
To all sniffing around the Husseys of the 16th century,
please, please, if
you come across a solid reference to a Jane Hussey
Rick et al. My postings to this list are only secondary to
my research file
which I regularly update to http://www.ancestry.com 's Ancestral
World Tree project.
So whatever I find, including sources, notes, etc. is posted
there as well
as here. And more there than here.
I had posted my research previously to the Pedigree Resource File on
http://www.familysearch.org and that was a mistake. They list your
address on the site and
so I'd get people looking me up in the phone book and calling
me at 8 in the
morning or 10 at night to want to discuss some person who I
had idly included in
my research. I frequently include everyone of a certain
surname in a certain
area, when I'm researching a family, because I don't want to
have to go back
and repeat research. You never know when that John Browning
might end up
being the cousin of the Peter Browning you're looking for,
and might provide
useful details.
At any rate, my point was, sometimes the Ancestral World Tree
is very useful.
Some researchers give quite copious notes within their
trees. Most do not
of course, but then that's why people pay for other's to do
their work for them!
Will Johnson, Professional Genealogist