e-mails?
I look at the signature, that is what counts, who says you are not using
your mother's, your wife's or your son's computer? Which means that the
signature and the e-mail address displayed may not apply to the same person.
And I hope you appreciate these messages are about the attacks on Peter
Stewart, not you.
With best wishes
Leo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal S." <h.sanders@comcast.net>
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: Newsgroup impersonality
Leo: As I told you in answer to your email, you are really dense. What do
you mean "Hal who?" I sign all my postings "Hal S.", and even you can
read my email address in my postings, which begins "H.Sanders." Put them
together and what do you get? Does that sound like "Pen name? Pseudonym?
Someone in hiding?" (sic) Even you should be able to figure that out. You
have really demonstrated in your recent screeds a pronounced inability to
comprehend.
Hal S.
""Leo van de Pas"" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:017701c5a0b3$c66d9e30$0300a8c0@Toshiba...
Hal who? Pen name? Pseudonym? Someone in hiding?
Peter Stewart _only_ contributes as Peter Stewart, and whether that name
is on his birth certificate is no-ones business.
What I find cowardly is to attack a person who is away and cannot defend
himself.
Also cowardly is when people are being asked pertinent questions about
their own statements and they refuse to give an answer and use as excuse
there "need" to know whether the reply is directed at Tom, Dick or Harry,
and whether Tom is Dick and not Harry. Name tags are not important
substance is.
Richardson proclaiming we are here to make friends is the first one to
offend.
Humour the questioner by supplying answers and _show_ you have nothing to
hide, no unqualifications to cover up. Own up to what you can do and what
you do know, then others are very kind and will help to fill the gaps.
Richardson wants genealogically filled messages, but he is the first to
start sniping and continue flames which have nothing to do with
genealogy.
----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: Newsgroup impersonality
Hal S. wrote:
I agree; it's pretty gutless to fire away with insults and then hide
behind
a phony name.
Hal S.
Yes, Hal, I agree. It's very gutless. No one likes a coward.
Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
Website: http://www.royalancestry.net