Fw: Richardson slip? Re: Descendants of Sir Richard de Lucy

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Fw: Richardson slip? Re: Descendants of Sir Richard de Lucy

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 05 aug 2005 00:28:01

The past has to be acknowledged before you can go on with a clean slate as
otherwise the past _will_ keep on lurking in the background. I see nothing
wrong calling anyone a fool if they do foolish things. The language is there
to describe actions, lets use the language correctly.


----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com>
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Richardson slip? Re: Descendants of Sir Richard de Lucy and
Rohese of Bou...


"Leo van de Pas" wrote:

I hope you realise you are way off beam by calling me a fool, Richardson
would not approve of that.

Leo van de Pas

Dear Leo ~

You're absolutely correct. I don't approve of John Brandon calling you
a fool. But, I don't approve of you calling me a fool either. Being
friendly is what works for me.

Having said that, I encourage you and Spencer Hines to make peace
between yourselves. It's time for all of us to heal our differences.


Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Website: http://www.royalancestry.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Brandon" <starbuck95@hotmail.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: Richardson slip? Re: Descendants of Sir Richard de Lucy and
Rohese of Bou...


Leo, you sour old fool ....




Douglas Richardson royala

Re: Fw: Richardson slip? Re: Descendants of Sir Richard de L

Legg inn av Douglas Richardson royala » 05 aug 2005 00:38:36

Dear Leo ~

I'm sure you and Spencer Hines can mend fences and be friends again, if
that is your desire. Friendly works for me.

You have a great database, Leo. I especially enjoy all your portraits.
They're terrific!

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Website: http://www.royalancestry.net


"Leo van de Pas" wrote:
The past has to be acknowledged before you can go on with a clean slate as
otherwise the past _will_ keep on lurking in the background. I see nothing
wrong calling anyone a fool if they do foolish things. The language is there
to describe actions, lets use the language correctly.


----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Richardson slip? Re: Descendants of Sir Richard de Lucy and
Rohese of Bou...


"Leo van de Pas" wrote:

I hope you realise you are way off beam by calling me a fool, Richardson
would not approve of that.

Leo van de Pas

Dear Leo ~

You're absolutely correct. I don't approve of John Brandon calling you
a fool. But, I don't approve of you calling me a fool either. Being
friendly is what works for me.

Having said that, I encourage you and Spencer Hines to make peace
between yourselves. It's time for all of us to heal our differences.


Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Website: http://www.royalancestry.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Brandon" <starbuck95@hotmail.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: Richardson slip? Re: Descendants of Sir Richard de Lucy and
Rohese of Bou...


Leo, you sour old fool ....




Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»