New database to test...
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
-
Denis Beauregard
New database to test...
Hi:
I decided to put a part of my huge database on the net.
In this first step, I put at a temporary URL a small set of the
database to see if it is working good with various browsers and
environments.
Also, I installed some means to block site copiers and I want to
be sure the site is working for regular users.
The temporary URL of the English version is:
http://www.francogene.com/testdb/998/index.php
At this time, the database is limited to my pre-1411 data. One reason
is that I would like to test it before putting a larger data set
(covering to 1710). At this time, nearly all pre-1411 data is about
ancestors of people who emigrated to New France (Quebec and Acadia).
I think I don't have yet lines that far for Louisianeses.
When the test will be completed, I will upgrade the database (to a
new URL) to include data from year 0 to 1710 and covering French
immigrants to the French colonies of North America, their ancestors
and their cousins (first generation).
For now, I will check my log and eventual feedbacks from visitors.
Denis
I decided to put a part of my huge database on the net.
In this first step, I put at a temporary URL a small set of the
database to see if it is working good with various browsers and
environments.
Also, I installed some means to block site copiers and I want to
be sure the site is working for regular users.
The temporary URL of the English version is:
http://www.francogene.com/testdb/998/index.php
At this time, the database is limited to my pre-1411 data. One reason
is that I would like to test it before putting a larger data set
(covering to 1710). At this time, nearly all pre-1411 data is about
ancestors of people who emigrated to New France (Quebec and Acadia).
I think I don't have yet lines that far for Louisianeses.
When the test will be completed, I will upgrade the database (to a
new URL) to include data from year 0 to 1710 and covering French
immigrants to the French colonies of North America, their ancestors
and their cousins (first generation).
For now, I will check my log and eventual feedbacks from visitors.
Denis
-
Graeme Wall
Re: New database to test...
In message <pueve1t38p3d7emtls6ieeni671406e1m5@4ax.com>
Denis Beauregard <no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote:
[snip]
You get back to year 0, I'm impressed - I think...
Site worked fine on Oregano v1, now that's confused you.
--
Graeme Wall
My genealogy website:
<http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/index.html>
Denis Beauregard <no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote:
[snip]
When the test will be completed, I will upgrade the database (to a
new URL) to include data from year 0 to 1710 and covering French
immigrants to the French colonies of North America, their ancestors
and their cousins (first generation).
You get back to year 0, I'm impressed - I think...
Site worked fine on Oregano v1, now that's confused you.
--
Graeme Wall
My genealogy website:
<http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/index.html>
-
Robert Melson
Re: New database to test...
In article <pueve1t38p3d7emtls6ieeni671406e1m5@4ax.com>,
Denis Beauregard <no@nospam.com.invalid> writes:
Just took a quick look at both the English and French versions, using
Mozilla under FreeBSD, and can report I was able to satisfactorilly view
every page I selected - didn't take time to try them all. The textual
explanations were clear and well formatted, though I would rate the "family
group sheets" as a 3 out of a possible 5 (here, though, I likely selected
unrepresentative families, so this so-so rating might be a trifle harsh). I
found the secondary indices a bit "busy" and would suggest a further level
of indexing alphabetically.
Overall, I'd give the site a 4 on a scale of 1-5, 5 being highest.
Bob Melson
--
Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
-----
"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." Thomas Reed
-----
Denis Beauregard <no@nospam.com.invalid> writes:
snip
The temporary URL of the English version is:
http://www.francogene.com/testdb/998/index.php
snip
For now, I will check my log and eventual feedbacks from visitors.
Denis
Denis,
Just took a quick look at both the English and French versions, using
Mozilla under FreeBSD, and can report I was able to satisfactorilly view
every page I selected - didn't take time to try them all. The textual
explanations were clear and well formatted, though I would rate the "family
group sheets" as a 3 out of a possible 5 (here, though, I likely selected
unrepresentative families, so this so-so rating might be a trifle harsh). I
found the secondary indices a bit "busy" and would suggest a further level
of indexing alphabetically.
Overall, I'd give the site a 4 on a scale of 1-5, 5 being highest.
Bob Melson
--
Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
-----
"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." Thomas Reed
-----
-
Denis Beauregard
Re: New database to test...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:24:30 +0100, Graeme Wall
<Graeme@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote in soc.genealogy.computing:
Actually, I have no data before 771 (a marriage of Charlemagne). So,
next time I will say I have data from 771 to 1410 (or 771 to 1710 when
the test will be completed).
As to the difficulty of going that far, it is not that important.
When you find a king, chances are good there are enough data to
find more generations. And at this time, more than 600 lines from
North American migrants are known to lead to a king (about 30 for
Quebec or Acadia migrants). Since only a few nobles migrated, there
are much more lines in Europe reaching a king.
Denis
<Graeme@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote in soc.genealogy.computing:
In message <pueve1t38p3d7emtls6ieeni671406e1m5@4ax.com
Denis Beauregard <no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote:
[snip]
When the test will be completed, I will upgrade the database (to a
new URL) to include data from year 0 to 1710 and covering French
immigrants to the French colonies of North America, their ancestors
and their cousins (first generation).
You get back to year 0, I'm impressed - I think...
Actually, I have no data before 771 (a marriage of Charlemagne). So,
next time I will say I have data from 771 to 1410 (or 771 to 1710 when
the test will be completed).
As to the difficulty of going that far, it is not that important.
When you find a king, chances are good there are enough data to
find more generations. And at this time, more than 600 lines from
North American migrants are known to lead to a king (about 30 for
Quebec or Acadia migrants). Since only a few nobles migrated, there
are much more lines in Europe reaching a king.
Site worked fine on Oregano v1, now that's confused you.
Denis
-
Fred Walter
Re: New database to test...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:38:08 -0400, Denis Beauregard
<no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote:
Tried several pages. All OK under Win xP and Mozilla Firefox 1.0.4.
Fred Walter.
<no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote:
Hi:
I decided to put a part of my huge database on the net.
In this first step, I put at a temporary URL a small set of the
database to see if it is working good with various browsers and
environments.
Also, I installed some means to block site copiers and I want to
be sure the site is working for regular users.
The temporary URL of the English version is:
http://www.francogene.com/testdb/998/index.php
At this time, the database is limited to my pre-1411 data. One reason
is that I would like to test it before putting a larger data set
(covering to 1710). At this time, nearly all pre-1411 data is about
ancestors of people who emigrated to New France (Quebec and Acadia).
I think I don't have yet lines that far for Louisianeses.
When the test will be completed, I will upgrade the database (to a
new URL) to include data from year 0 to 1710 and covering French
immigrants to the French colonies of North America, their ancestors
and their cousins (first generation).
For now, I will check my log and eventual feedbacks from visitors.
Denis
Tried several pages. All OK under Win xP and Mozilla Firefox 1.0.4.
Fred Walter.
-
Maloney Empire
Re: New database to test...
Hello,
Tried a few pages. No problems with I.E. & M.E.
Opened quickly.
--
Di Maloney
Please remove 1 from email address to reply direct.
"Fred Walter" <flwalter@oztralia.com> wrote in message
news:mfr0f19g5gni1gtblr9jeq80mulpklnbcl@4ax.com...
Tried a few pages. No problems with I.E. & M.E.
Opened quickly.
--
Di Maloney
Please remove 1 from email address to reply direct.
"Fred Walter" <flwalter@oztralia.com> wrote in message
news:mfr0f19g5gni1gtblr9jeq80mulpklnbcl@4ax.com...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:38:08 -0400, Denis Beauregard
no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote:
Hi:
I decided to put a part of my huge database on the net.
In this first step, I put at a temporary URL a small set of the
database to see if it is working good with various browsers and
environments.
Also, I installed some means to block site copiers and I want to
be sure the site is working for regular users.
The temporary URL of the English version is:
http://www.francogene.com/testdb/998/index.php
At this time, the database is limited to my pre-1411 data. One reason
is that I would like to test it before putting a larger data set
(covering to 1710). At this time, nearly all pre-1411 data is about
ancestors of people who emigrated to New France (Quebec and Acadia).
I think I don't have yet lines that far for Louisianeses.
When the test will be completed, I will upgrade the database (to a
new URL) to include data from year 0 to 1710 and covering French
immigrants to the French colonies of North America, their ancestors
and their cousins (first generation).
For now, I will check my log and eventual feedbacks from visitors.
Denis
Tried several pages. All OK under Win xP and Mozilla Firefox 1.0.4.
Fred Walter.
-
Dolly Ziegler
Denis Re: New database to test...
Hello, Denis. I accessed your database using Windows XP and Mozilla
Firefox browser. That's the kind of feedback you need?
Tried to reply only to you but don't see how to do it. Good luck! Cheers,
Dolly in Maryland USA
Firefox browser. That's the kind of feedback you need?
Tried to reply only to you but don't see how to do it. Good luck! Cheers,
Dolly in Maryland USA
-
Ginny Wagner
RE: New database to test...
Hi Denis,
np w Windows XP and Explorer version 6 both French and English. Just
wondering what the check box beside the name is for? I tried checking
it but didn't seem to do anything that I could tell. Very ambitious
project -- looks like it is going quite well.
Ginny
np w Windows XP and Explorer version 6 both French and English. Just
wondering what the check box beside the name is for? I tried checking
it but didn't seem to do anything that I could tell. Very ambitious
project -- looks like it is going quite well.
-
Denis Beauregard
Re: New database to test...
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:57:36 +0000 (UTC), ginnywagner@austin.rr.com
("Ginny Wagner") wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
Those famous check boxes ! I wondered if I should keep them only in
my personal version or not...
That format is the only one I have to browse the database. The other
format is a set of Excel files and it is not obvious to sort them by
family as there is a column for the link to the parents of the man in
a couple, and another for the link to the parents of the woman. I
can't sort by 2 columns to have all siblings side by side.
From time to time, I compare my data to some printed genealogies,
either to find more people (there are many articles that concentrate
on one family and in my case include the descendants who went back
to France after some year in New France) or to find mistakes. So,
I start from the 1sr generation, check each child when I have the
same data, and then explore each child. Mozilla keeps the check so
when I get back one generation, I know which families I already
compared.
So, you see, there is nothing connected to the checkboxes. They are
only a part of my validation process.
I work on it since 5 years. It is only this year I will try to make
some money from it with an Internet version. But this is not the main
reason for having it on the web (as I could have only an index and
this would be enough to attrack trafic and clicks). No, the main
reason is to centralize long lines in Europe. At this time, there
are about 5 similar projects like mine on the net. One has merely
copied an old source published in 1870-1891, another one has copied
a source published in 1983 (he even copied the notes in it). And
there are at least 2 more huge US-made databases where everybody is
linked together. None of those can be considered as reliable. The
5th project is based on more reliable data but is not freely
accessible (except in public libraries using the CD-ROM version).
What I try to do is a reliable work but also to attract those medieval
lines that may exist somewhere (only the reliable one).
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
("Ginny Wagner") wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
Hi Denis,
np w Windows XP and Explorer version 6 both French and English. Just
wondering what the check box beside the name is for? I tried checking
it but didn't seem to do anything that I could tell.
Those famous check boxes ! I wondered if I should keep them only in
my personal version or not...
That format is the only one I have to browse the database. The other
format is a set of Excel files and it is not obvious to sort them by
family as there is a column for the link to the parents of the man in
a couple, and another for the link to the parents of the woman. I
can't sort by 2 columns to have all siblings side by side.
From time to time, I compare my data to some printed genealogies,
either to find more people (there are many articles that concentrate
on one family and in my case include the descendants who went back
to France after some year in New France) or to find mistakes. So,
I start from the 1sr generation, check each child when I have the
same data, and then explore each child. Mozilla keeps the check so
when I get back one generation, I know which families I already
compared.
So, you see, there is nothing connected to the checkboxes. They are
only a part of my validation process.
Very ambitious
project -- looks like it is going quite well.Ginny
I work on it since 5 years. It is only this year I will try to make
some money from it with an Internet version. But this is not the main
reason for having it on the web (as I could have only an index and
this would be enough to attrack trafic and clicks). No, the main
reason is to centralize long lines in Europe. At this time, there
are about 5 similar projects like mine on the net. One has merely
copied an old source published in 1870-1891, another one has copied
a source published in 1983 (he even copied the notes in it). And
there are at least 2 more huge US-made databases where everybody is
linked together. None of those can be considered as reliable. The
5th project is based on more reliable data but is not freely
accessible (except in public libraries using the CD-ROM version).
What I try to do is a reliable work but also to attract those medieval
lines that may exist somewhere (only the reliable one).
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
-
Doug McDonald
Re: New database to test...
Denis Beauregard wrote:
A nice idea, but from what I saw on the web site you don't show
lines, only individual people. Leo van de Pas's site is how it should be.
Doug McDonald
What I try to do is a reliable work but also to attract those medieval
lines that may exist somewhere (only the reliable one).
A nice idea, but from what I saw on the web site you don't show
lines, only individual people. Leo van de Pas's site is how it should be.
Doug McDonald
-
Leo van de Pas
Re: New database to test...
Dear Doug,
Thanks for the kind implication but this should have been said differently
Darrin Lythgoes program_as used by Leo van de Pas_ is how it should be.
I am still amazed by what Ian Fettes did. I have a program written in DOS in
1990 and Ian was made aware of Darrin Lythgoes program and after doing a
fair amount of work is now is able to transfer the data from this old
program into the new. Magic.
Leo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug McDonald" <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu>
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:58 AM
Subject: Re: New database to test...
Thanks for the kind implication but this should have been said differently
Darrin Lythgoes program_as used by Leo van de Pas_ is how it should be.
I am still amazed by what Ian Fettes did. I have a program written in DOS in
1990 and Ian was made aware of Darrin Lythgoes program and after doing a
fair amount of work is now is able to transfer the data from this old
program into the new. Magic.
Leo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug McDonald" <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu>
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:58 AM
Subject: Re: New database to test...
Denis Beauregard wrote:
What I try to do is a reliable work but also to attract those medieval
lines that may exist somewhere (only the reliable one).
A nice idea, but from what I saw on the web site you don't show
lines, only individual people. Leo van de Pas's site is how it should be.
Doug McDonald
-
Denis Beauregard
Re: New database to test...
Le Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:58:52 -0500, Doug McDonald
<mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu> écrivait dans soc.genealogy.medieval:
The current version on the web is a subset of the database. It cuts
at year 1410. So, for someone who married in 1410 or before, you will
see the parents with links and the married children with no link.
And for the parents, say married in 1380, you would see a link to the
child married in 1410.
I want to see how robots will try to copy the who site and if anyone
tries to do it. And when I will believe I can go ahead, I will add
the 1411-1710 block. Thus far, I think only 2 Quebec and 1 Acadia
immigrants with a long line would be omitted from the site (but not
their ancestors).
As to compare with the database of Leo, mine is far from being
complete and it is not the primary goal. I will see if I should
try to have more people or only the main lines from immigrants to
royalty as it is now. I can easily find more material for many lines,
by the way.
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
<mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu> écrivait dans soc.genealogy.medieval:
Denis Beauregard wrote:
What I try to do is a reliable work but also to attract those medieval
lines that may exist somewhere (only the reliable one).
A nice idea, but from what I saw on the web site you don't show
lines, only individual people. Leo van de Pas's site is how it should be.
The current version on the web is a subset of the database. It cuts
at year 1410. So, for someone who married in 1410 or before, you will
see the parents with links and the married children with no link.
And for the parents, say married in 1380, you would see a link to the
child married in 1410.
I want to see how robots will try to copy the who site and if anyone
tries to do it. And when I will believe I can go ahead, I will add
the 1411-1710 block. Thus far, I think only 2 Quebec and 1 Acadia
immigrants with a long line would be omitted from the site (but not
their ancestors).
As to compare with the database of Leo, mine is far from being
complete and it is not the primary goal. I will see if I should
try to have more people or only the main lines from immigrants to
royalty as it is now. I can easily find more material for many lines,
by the way.
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
-
Denis Beauregard
Re: Denis Re: New database to test...
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:45:26 +0000 (UTC), dsz@bcpl.net (Dolly Ziegler)
wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
I hide my email because of spam. You can use:
denis.b at francogene dot com
replace at by @ and dot by .
Feedback: if any browser can't visit the site (because of the
anti-robot method) and for the presentation (if you can understand the
genealogy or the index).
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
Hello, Denis. I accessed your database using Windows XP and Mozilla
Firefox browser. That's the kind of feedback you need?
Tried to reply only to you but don't see how to do it. Good luck! Cheers,
Dolly in Maryland USA
I hide my email because of spam. You can use:
denis.b at francogene dot com
replace at by @ and dot by .
Feedback: if any browser can't visit the site (because of the
anti-robot method) and for the presentation (if you can understand the
genealogy or the index).
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
-
D. Spencer Hines
Ian Fettes
Ian Fettes is a VERY talented man.
'Nuff Said.
DSH
""Leo van de Pas"" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:001801c5986c$bfbde3f0$0300a8c0@Toshiba...
| Dear Doug,
|
| Thanks for the kind implication but this should have been said
differently
|
| Darrin Lythgoes program_as used by Leo van de Pas_ is how it should
be.
|
| I am still amazed by what Ian Fettes did. I have a program written in
DOS in
| 1990 and Ian was made aware of Darrin Lythgoes program and after doing
a
| fair amount of work is now is able to transfer the data from this old
| program into the new. Magic.
| Leo
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Doug McDonald" <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu>
| To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
| Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:58 AM
| Subject: Re: New database to test...
|
|
| > Denis Beauregard wrote:
| >
| >> What I try to do is a reliable work but also to attract those
medieval
| >> lines that may exist somewhere (only the reliable one).
| >
| >
| > A nice idea, but from what I saw on the web site you don't show
| > lines, only individual people. Leo van de Pas's site is how it
should be.
| >
| > Doug McDonald
'Nuff Said.
DSH
""Leo van de Pas"" <leovdpas@netspeed.com.au> wrote in message
news:001801c5986c$bfbde3f0$0300a8c0@Toshiba...
| Dear Doug,
|
| Thanks for the kind implication but this should have been said
differently
|
| Darrin Lythgoes program_as used by Leo van de Pas_ is how it should
be.
|
| I am still amazed by what Ian Fettes did. I have a program written in
DOS in
| 1990 and Ian was made aware of Darrin Lythgoes program and after doing
a
| fair amount of work is now is able to transfer the data from this old
| program into the new. Magic.
| Leo
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Doug McDonald" <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu>
| To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
| Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:58 AM
| Subject: Re: New database to test...
|
|
| > Denis Beauregard wrote:
| >
| >> What I try to do is a reliable work but also to attract those
medieval
| >> lines that may exist somewhere (only the reliable one).
| >
| >
| > A nice idea, but from what I saw on the web site you don't show
| > lines, only individual people. Leo van de Pas's site is how it
should be.
| >
| > Doug McDonald
-
Denis Beauregard
New French to American database up to 1710
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:38:08 -0400, Denis Beauregard
<no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in soc.genealogy.french:
The final version of the database is at those URL:
http://www.francogene.com/quebec-genealogy English Version
http://www.francogene.com/genealogie-quebec French Version
This version covers beginnings to 1710, plus their known ancestors,
and eventually, those gone to foreign places when the marriage is
known.
The territory covered include today's Quebec (what was called
Canada at that time), Acadia, and French forts to Louisiana.
Theorically, the list is complete, i.e. I should have all the
married couples of those area and those who have children out of
wedlock. This territory is the Quebec diocese at this time.
I included a part of royal lines, but not all of them (I still have
to complete my database). I will later add links from my royal line
page (qrd30 on my site), and also from some kinds of migrants like
filles du roi, regiment de Carignan and main recrews.
As another project, I will try to display married immigrants and
emigrants after 1710 (in short: someone married foreign or with
parents married foreign). When this will be done, I will add a
list by place and replace my old list of immigrants. Also, I will
probably have some statistics like the number of descendants in
my database in each century.
Obviously, if you see mistakes or if you have new data, they will
be welcome. Concerning those who went back to France (or foreign),
I try to include the generation after the migration.
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
<no@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in soc.genealogy.french:
In this first step, I put at a temporary URL a small set of the
database to see if it is working good with various browsers and
environments.
The final version of the database is at those URL:
http://www.francogene.com/quebec-genealogy English Version
http://www.francogene.com/genealogie-quebec French Version
This version covers beginnings to 1710, plus their known ancestors,
and eventually, those gone to foreign places when the marriage is
known.
The territory covered include today's Quebec (what was called
Canada at that time), Acadia, and French forts to Louisiana.
Theorically, the list is complete, i.e. I should have all the
married couples of those area and those who have children out of
wedlock. This territory is the Quebec diocese at this time.
I included a part of royal lines, but not all of them (I still have
to complete my database). I will later add links from my royal line
page (qrd30 on my site), and also from some kinds of migrants like
filles du roi, regiment de Carignan and main recrews.
As another project, I will try to display married immigrants and
emigrants after 1710 (in short: someone married foreign or with
parents married foreign). When this will be done, I will add a
list by place and replace my old list of immigrants. Also, I will
probably have some statistics like the number of descendants in
my database in each century.
Obviously, if you see mistakes or if you have new data, they will
be welcome. Concerning those who went back to France (or foreign),
I try to include the generation after the migration.
Denis
--
0 Denis Beauregard
/\/ http://www.francogene.com
|\ >>Adresse modifiée souvent/email changed frequently<<
/ | Société généalogique canadienne-française
oo oo http://www.sgcf.com
-
Denis Beauregard
Re: New database to test...
Le Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:49:40 -0400, "Ron Chenier"
<ronchenier@rogers.com> écrivait dans soc.genealogy.computing:
Indeed, I have not put the link to my email and I am preparing a
new spam-protected contact form.
Use this one
denis.b at francogene dot com
Denis
<ronchenier@rogers.com> écrivait dans soc.genealogy.computing:
Denis,
Your new database says to contact you if there are some errors.
How can we contact you?
Indeed, I have not put the link to my email and I am preparing a
new spam-protected contact form.
Use this one
denis.b at francogene dot com
Denis