you were away? It is as simple as that. It is more than impropriate to lie
about people, especially in public.
----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com>
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 8:30 AM
Subject: Private is private. Public is Public. It's that simple.
Yes or no? Did you post Solitaire's private e-mail to you or not? If
you did, it's a very inappropriate think to do.
Private is private. Public is public. It's that simple, Leo.
Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
"Leo" wrote:
"Just when I thought it was safe to get back into the (genealogical)
waters".
Douglas,
I am so glad to see that you find it important to get answers. I am still
waiting (how many times asked for?) for substance to your claim that I
was
fighting with everyone while you were away. You can't have rules applying
to
others but not to you. It is rather "prissy" (to use one of your terms)
to
expect that.
----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: OT Manners and Relations was Re: Mr. Richardson's Unfounded
Charges
Dear Leo ~
You're dodging the question. Did you post a private e-mail from
Solitaire on the newsgroup? Yes or no?
DR
"Leo" wrote:
I am not sure anymore, but he wanted it in the newsgroup and that is
where I
responded.
----- Original Message -----
From: <royalancestry@msn.com
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: OT Manners and Relations was Re: Mr. Richardson's
Unfounded
Charges
Dear Leo ~
I'm curious. Was this a private e-mail sent to you from Solitaire,
or
a public post that I missed seeing?
Private is private, public is public. Which is it?
DR
"Leo" wrote:
Solitaire is showing his true colours. See below. At times and with
some
people matters _can_ be discussed and resolved in private, but with
some
people they can't. As Solitaire requests, the matter is back on the
newsgroup.
----- Original Message -----
From: "solitaire" <soli13taire@verizon.net
To: "Leo" <leo@home.netspeed.com.au
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: Mr. Richardson's Unfounded Charges
Leo wrote:
Solitaire seems to overlook that it is medieval genealogical
methodology
is being discussed. The reliability of the people concerned is
very
important as only with that knowledge people can decide who to
trust.
And
some people just cannot ask from others they themselves are
unwilling
or
unable to give. And this does seem to apply to Richardson, he
demands
respect but is unable or unwilling to give it.
I posted TO THE NEWSGROUP.
You want to discuss anything, do it IN THE FUCKING NEWSGROUP.
WHEN THE DISCUSSION IS ONLY ABOUT THE MANNERS OF THE TWO PEOPLE,
IT
SHOULD
BE IN EMAIL.