C.P.Addition: Isabel Booth wife of Ralph Neville, 3dr Earl o

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
paul bulkley

C.P.Addition: Isabel Booth wife of Ralph Neville, 3dr Earl o

Legg inn av paul bulkley » 17 apr 2005 21:40:02

Dear Peter Stewart:

It is a terrible affliction to be forgetful. I trust
your mind will improve in time.

In the meantime you can refer to Archives March 2004,
read your opinions, and refresh your memory.

The problem Peter is the difficulty of accepting your
claims because your standards rise and fall like a
roller coaster.

The nature of statements made by you to support your
own claims sometimes lack the very definitive
information and preciseness that you demand of others.

I suspect that your contributions would be better
appreciated with a levelling of your standards.

Sincerely Yours,

Paul Bulkley



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Peter Stewart

Re: C.P.Addition: Isabel Booth wife of Ralph Neville, 3dr Ea

Legg inn av Peter Stewart » 17 apr 2005 23:07:44

"paul bulkley" <designeconomic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:20050417193146.3873.qmail@web21321.mail.yahoo.com...
Dear Peter Stewart:

It is a terrible affliction to be forgetful. I trust
your mind will improve in time.

In the meantime you can refer to Archives March 2004,
read your opinions, and refresh your memory.

The problem Peter is the difficulty of accepting your
claims because your standards rise and fall like a
roller coaster.

The nature of statements made by you to support your
own claims sometimes lack the very definitive
information and preciseness that you demand of others.

I suspect that your contributions would be better
appreciated with a levelling of your standards.

Sincerely Yours,

No, this is plainly INsincere on your part - you are flatly lying about my
statements.

Once again, the request is simple: produce the post/s of mine that you
allege contain the claim that Letitia's husband "must be a Patric".

You can't avoid this by seeking to characterise my opinions in your words.
We have all seen, repeatedly, how wildly inaccurate your understanding can
be on perfectly straightforward points.

Peter Stewart

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»