FW: Re: FW: OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
John Parsons

FW: Re: FW: OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL

Legg inn av John Parsons » 10 feb 2005 18:51:01

One last time, Douglas.

I said that Diana was wrong *to describe Camilla as part of her marriage.*
I did not say that she was wrong to criticize Camilla for being Charles's
mistress or to criticize Charles for having a mistress. As his wife, Diana
had every right, rhyme and reason to be critical.

By definition any marriage consists of only two people (whether you call
them husband and wife, husband and husband, or wife and wife). Camilla
therefore could not be an intrinsic part of the Wales marriage, though she
was part of Charles' personal life. As far as the Wales marriage was
concerned, Camilla was part of a *menage a trois*, but the only marriage of
which she was part was her own to Andrew Parker Bowles.

Regards

John P.


From: "Douglas Richardson royalancestry@msn.com" <royalancestry@msn.com
To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: FW: OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL
Date: 10 Feb 2005 09:23:40 -0800

Diana was wrong? Where did you get that dumb idea? This is a new low
for the newsgroup.

I was married for 14 years and never considered looking at another
woman. I believed it was my DUTY to be loyal to my wife. Charles
evidently thought otherwise and he has paid the ultimate price for his
foolishness and adultery. A man who marries without making a full
commitment to his blushing bride is only asking for trouble.

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Website: http://www.royalancestry.net

Douglas Richardson royala

OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL

Legg inn av Douglas Richardson royala » 10 feb 2005 19:06:15

Diana was quite right when she said Camilla was part of their marriage.
When your husband leaves you repeatedly to be with another woman, then
your marriage is definitely a "bit crowded."

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Website: http://www.royalancestry.net

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»