FW: Re: FW: OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
John Parsons

FW: Re: FW: OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL

Legg inn av John Parsons » 10 feb 2005 18:31:02

I meant that Diana was wrong to include Camilla as part of the marriage,
which she was not. She was an ongoing part of Charles' personal life, but
not part of a marriage that united only 2 people, Charles and Diana.

You are entirely right that Diana did not *openly* (publicly) complain about
the situation for a long time, until the Morton book appeared in 1992. But
it was of course the private agony that really mattered and that was what
did all the damage. That agony had been going on for a long time by 1992.

Regards

John P.


From: GRHaleJr@aol.com
To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: FW: OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:13:59 EST


In a message dated 2/10/2005 11:57:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
carmi47@msn.com writes:

Strictly put, then, Diana was wrong.




If your wife was in an affair with another man, how would you react?
Would
you divorce her, abide with the situation, or get your gun and go after
both
of them? Diana did neither for the longest time. I think she tolerated
as
much as she could stand of Big Ears philandering.

Now would be an excellent time for the British people to do away with a
useless monarchy.


Gordon Hale
Grand Prairie, Texas


Betty Owen

Re: Re: FW: OT Re: FW: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL

Legg inn av Betty Owen » 10 feb 2005 20:31:02

thank you john for the historical affair....
Betty


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005

D. Spencer Hines

Re: CHARLES & CAMILLA - ITS OFFICIAL

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 10 feb 2005 21:41:01

John is indeed quite famous for his historical affairs. <g>

DSH

""Betty Owen"" <winteros@wt.net> wrote in message
news:001001c50fa6$3bc7e130$a58877d8@owens...

| thank you john for the historical affair....
| Betty

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»