FW: Re: Eleanor Of Aquitaine

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
John Parsons

FW: Re: Eleanor Of Aquitaine

Legg inn av John Parsons » 08 feb 2005 12:41:01

Hines, the word is correctly spelt "petard"--not "petar."

John P.


From: "D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com
Reply-To: "D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com
To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: Eleanor Of Aquitaine
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:44:24 -0000

Hilarius Magnus Cum Laude!

Pogue Stewart has proven, once again, that he cannot even read a simple
newsgroup post -- nor be honest about what someone else has ACTUALLY
said or written -- it's just not in him -- or in his damaged brain -- to
be able to do that.

Hoist With His Own Petar....

PRATFALL!!!

KAWHOMP!!!

KERSPLAT!!!

I say again:

Hilarius Magnus Cum Laude!

Pogue Stewart pig-ignorantly thinks I have plumped for an 1124 birthdate
for Eleanor of Aquitaine.

Pig ignorant indeed that chap is.

Brain-Damaged....

I have not plumped for any date -- but Pogue Stewart HAS -- on several
occasions -- sometimes as simply 1124 and on other occasions as circa
1124 -- to give himself some wiggle room -- as he bloviates, web-spins
and thumbsucks.

I HAVE pointed out that many fine scholars, including both accomplished
mediaeval genealogists and historians have held that Eleanor was born
circa 1122 -- which is true -- they have so stated it.

Pogue Stewart and his sidekick, John Parsons, have offered not a
SCINTILLA of PROOF to the contrary.

If we see some PROOF, solid EVIDENCE, we will weigh it on its MERITS,
reason carefully and decide accordingly.

That's what any intelligent, serious, genealogical and/or historical
inquirer should do.

But we do NOT give credence to any of the arrant bloviating we have seen
to date -- from both Stewart and Parsons,

If Pogue Stewart has some CONVINCING PROOF for a birthdate for Eleanor
of Aquitaine in 1124 -- or circa 1124 -- he has talked out of both sides
of his mouth in that respect -- let him present it here for examination
and adjudication.

Otherwise, he had best just stand in the corner with the dunce's cap on
and continue to be ridiculed and excoriated. His idle bluffs and hissy
fits don't work here.
------------------

Deeelightful!

Great Sport!

Kicking Pogue Stewart in the arse and watching him squeal is just
ABSURDLY easy.

Why its easier than shooting phlegmatic frogs in a barrel or drunken
kangaroos in the Outback, Virginia.

It just shouldn't get any better than this, Virginia -- but it always
does.

D. Spencer Hines

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Vires et Honor

D. Spencer Hines

Re: Re: Eleanor Of Aquitaine

Legg inn av D. Spencer Hines » 08 feb 2005 20:01:02

Parsons, you sheep-ignorant FOOL!

Read _Hamlet_ -- you know, the play written by Will Shakespeare.

ACT III, Scene iv, Lines 207 and 208 -- since you seem to be
brain-damaged too.

Parsons, you are as dumb as dirt and thrice as arrogant.

Parsons, hoist with his own petar.

That Olympian Hauteur shattered into a thousand pieces -- those
"fragments" he loves so well.

PRATFALL!!!

KAWHOMP!!!

KERSPLAT!!!

The word can also be spelled PETARD -- but I'm using Shakespeare's
language.

"The final happiness of man consists in the contemplation of truth....
This is sought for its own sake, and is directed to no other end beyond
itself." Saint Thomas Aquinas, [1224/5-1274] "Summa Contra Gentiles"
[c.1258-1264]

"Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur. Odi profanum vulgus et arceo."

Quintus Aurelius Stultus [33 B.C. - 42 A.D.]

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
opus.

D. Spencer Hines

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Vires et Honor

""John Parsons"" <carmi47@msn.com> wrote in message
news:BAY7-F27531116AD145B5A88FE1B2740@phx.gbl...

| Hines, the word is correctly spelt "petard"--not "petar."
|
| John P.
|
|
| >From: "D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com>
| >Reply-To: "D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden@hotmail.com>
| >To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
| >Subject: Re: Eleanor Of Aquitaine
| >Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:44:24 -0000
| >
| >Hilarius Magnus Cum Laude!
| >
| >Pogue Stewart has proven, once again, that he cannot even read a
| >simple newsgroup post -- nor be honest about what someone else
| >has ACTUALLY said or written -- it's just not in him -- or in his
| >damaged brain -- to be able to do that.
| >
| >Hoist With His Own Petar....
| >
| >PRATFALL!!!
| >
| >KAWHOMP!!!
| >
| >KERSPLAT!!!
| >
| >I say again:
| >
| >Hilarius Magnus Cum Laude!
| >
| >Pogue Stewart pig-ignorantly thinks I have plumped for an 1124
birthdate
| >for Eleanor of Aquitaine.
| >
| >Pig ignorant indeed that chap is.
| >
| >Brain-Damaged....
| >
| >I have not plumped for any date -- but Pogue Stewart HAS -- on
several
| >occasions -- sometimes as simply 1124 and on other occasions as circa
| >1124 -- to give himself some wiggle room -- as he bloviates,
web-spins
| >and thumbsucks.
| >
| >I HAVE pointed out that many fine scholars, including both
accomplished
| >mediaeval genealogists and historians have held that Eleanor was born
| >circa 1122 -- which is true -- they have so stated it.
| >
| >Pogue Stewart and his sidekick, John Parsons, have offered not a
| >SCINTILLA of PROOF to the contrary.
| >
| >If we see some PROOF, solid EVIDENCE, we will weigh it on its MERITS,
| >reason carefully and decide accordingly.
| >
| >That's what any intelligent, serious, genealogical and/or historical
| >inquirer should do.
| >
| >But we do NOT give credence to any of the arrant bloviating we have
seen
| >to date -- from both Stewart and Parsons,
| >
| >If Pogue Stewart has some CONVINCING PROOF for a birthdate for
Eleanor
| >of Aquitaine in 1124 -- or circa 1124 -- he has talked out of both
sides
| >of his mouth in that respect -- let him present it here for
examination
| >and adjudication.
| >
| >Otherwise, he had best just stand in the corner with the dunce's cap
on
| >and continue to be ridiculed and excoriated. His idle bluffs and
hissy
| >fits don't work here.
| >------------------
| >
| >Deeelightful!
| >
| >Great Sport!
| >
| >Kicking Pogue Stewart in the arse and watching him squeal is just
| >ABSURDLY easy.
| >
| >Why its easier than shooting phlegmatic frogs in a barrel or drunken
| >kangaroos in the Outback, Virginia.
| >
| >It just shouldn't get any better than this, Virginia -- but it always
| >does.
| >
| >D. Spencer Hines
| >
| >Lux et Veritas et Libertas
| >
| >Vires et Honor

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»