Richardson sloppy again was Fw: de la Pole Dukes of Suffolk

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
Leo van de Pas

Richardson sloppy again was Fw: de la Pole Dukes of Suffolk

Legg inn av Leo van de Pas » 04 feb 2005 01:21:02

royalancestry@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107368698.164698.74870@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Dear David ~

snip
On the other hand, John de la Pole's sister, Anne de la Pole, wife of
Gaillard du Fort IV, seigneur of Duras, does have traceable
descendants. You can find information on her family in the following
sources:

Anselme, Hist. de la Maison Royale de France 5 (1730): 734. Beltz,
Memorials of the Most Noble Order of the Garter (1841): clxiii, clxv
(footnote 3). Vallet de Viriville, Hist. de Charles VII 3 (1865): 229.
Durand, La Maison de Durfort à l'Époque Moderne (1975): 28-30.
Peña, Docs. sur la Maison de Durfort (XIe-XVe Siècle) (1977). TG 4
(1983): 131-136. Schwennicke, Europäische Stammtafeln 10 (1986):
113 (sub Durfort). Archives Historiques de Département de la Gironde
7 (1865): 444-446; 16 (1878): 258-259.

At first I was wondering had Richardson found a new French noble family? du
Fort?
How fascinating. He gives as one of the Sources ES Volume 10 Tafel 113.
First I looked in the index but could not find any du Fort listed, then on
Tafel 113 I find Gaillard IV de Durfort, Seigneur de Duras. Obviously he has
been mucking about with the name of this family. The IV belongs by the
Christian name, not after the surname. As members have other first names as
well. The surname is de Durfort--- not du Fort.
How sloppy can he get?

Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia

Douglas Richardson royala

Re: de la Pole Dukes of Suffolk

Legg inn av Douglas Richardson royala » 04 feb 2005 01:22:00

Were you saying something, Leo?


"Leo van de Pas" wrote:
royalancestry@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107368698.164698.74870@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
At first I was wondering had Richardson found a new French noble
family? du
Fort?

How fascinating. He gives as one of the Sources ES Volume 10 Tafel
113.
First I looked in the index but could not find any du Fort listed,
then on
Tafel 113 I find Gaillard IV de Durfort, Seigneur de Duras. Obviously
he has
been mucking about with the name of this family. The IV belongs by
the
Christian name, not after the surname. As members have other first
names as
well. The surname is de Durfort--- not du Fort.

How sloppy can he get?

Leo van de Pas
Canberra, Australia

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»