FW: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
John Parsons

FW: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew

Legg inn av John Parsons » 19 nov 2004 18:21:02

As of the last time I read about this, the date was still in dispute &
further excavation had been deemed necessary before the final word could be
said. At any rate the discovery suggests that the Roman presence in this
area of Galilee was stronger than previously thought.

Regards

John P.



From: WJhonson@aol.com
To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:32:30 EST

In a message dated 11/19/2004 7:11:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
carmi47@msn.com writes:

The debate over the propriety of using the word "carpenter" has been
sharpened by the discovery and excavation of what was clearly a thriving
and

cosmopolitan Roman city very near Nazareth. If Joseph was in any way
involved in the building trade he most likely would have had a good deal
of
work in that city,

Built long after Jesus' birth. You left out that part.
Will

Gjest

Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew

Legg inn av Gjest » 19 nov 2004 18:31:01

In a message dated 11/19/2004 9:18:34 AM Pacific Standard Time,
carmi47@msn.com writes:

As of the last time I read about this, the date was still in dispute &
further excavation had been deemed necessary before the final word could be
said. At any rate the discovery suggests that the Roman presence in this
area of Galilee was stronger than previously thought.


No it does not. The only people arguing that Nazareth existed at the time of
Jesus are fundamental Christians. The archaeologists all agree it did not.
Will

Gjest

Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew

Legg inn av Gjest » 19 nov 2004 20:21:01

"> > "... shepherds in the fields watching over their flocks by night."
Shepherds only do that at one time in the year--when the ewes are
lambing in"

THIS is only "proof" for those who somehow (incredulously) believe that sheep are kept indoors nine months out of the year. That is not even true today, let along in the Palestine/Judea of the 1st century.
The shepherds lived with their flocks year-round. Where do you imagine the shepherds lived in the Winter? And where do you imageine the Sheep lived? In a motel?
Will

Terry

Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew

Legg inn av Terry » 20 nov 2004 01:41:02

----- Original Message -----
From: <WJhonson@aol.com>
To: <GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew


In a message dated 11/19/2004 9:18:34 AM Pacific Standard Time,
carmi47@msn.com writes:

As of the last time I read about this, the date was still in dispute &
further excavation had been deemed necessary before the final word could
be
said. At any rate the discovery suggests that the Roman presence in this
area of Galilee was stronger than previously thought.


No it does not. The only people arguing that Nazareth existed at the time
of
Jesus are fundamental Christians. The archaeologists all agree it did
not.
Will

And we all know how arcurate they are!
Terry


Gjest

Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Jesus, his brother and his nephew

Legg inn av Gjest » 20 nov 2004 18:41:01

Still hooked on this childish, unbelievable crap, aren't you John.

When will you start your brain to working and realize how stupid the entire
subject is and take it elsewhere?

Until then!

Gordon Hale
Grand Prairie, Texas

Svar

Gå tilbake til «soc.genealogy.medieval»