So in 1900 we find Boliver Sharp in St. Tammany Parish, LA. He's 36, married
8 years with four kids; Samuel is 7, David is 5, Joseph is 3 and Alice is 1.
Wife Viola is 34. (Roll 583, second page 33 of the Census.)
Now, appearances are that Boliver isn't a very common name, and indeed I
find only one person with that name anywhere. And in 1910 he's there on
roll 531, page 40 of the Census. Adjacent to the entry for his family is
his mother Caroline, now age 80 and widowed. (She preceded Boliver on
the 1900 Census page, age 70 and widowed.) The census taker is a little
dyslexic, to be sure, as lots of names don't look right on this page,
including wife Viola who's now Eolia V. See also Persey above, who was
Percy E. in the 1900 Census. But the kids...! It looks like Boliver
has traded them in. We've got Hermon L. age 18, Dallas C. age 17,
Charles A. age 14, daughter Doney C. age 10, and a fifth kid now, Zula M.
age 4.
Any ideas what gives here?
--
More abuse of eminent domain!
http://www.villagelandgrab.com/
Traded in the kids?
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
-
Christopher Jahn
Re: Traded in the kids?
clifto <clifto@gmail.com> wrote in
news:lbimv3-l7g.ln1@remote.clifto.com:
WEll, It's like that one of the census takers got the names wrong
(since all the kids seem to be there on the second one, and are
the correct ages). The enumerators didn't always speak to the
actual households involved - if they weren't at home, a neighbor
might have supplied the information. If they didn't know the
family too well, names and ages are frequently off.
OR the enumerator didn't understand the name given, and
interpreted what they thought they heard. My great-great
grandmother was named "Transylvania." One census lists her as
"Frances Sylvia."
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html
"Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support
group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the
bar." - Drew Carey
news:lbimv3-l7g.ln1@remote.clifto.com:
So in 1900 we find Boliver Sharp in St. Tammany Parish, LA.
He's 36, married 8 years with four kids; Samuel is 7, David is
5, Joseph is 3 and Alice is 1. Wife Viola is 34. (Roll 583,
second page 33 of the Census.)
Now, appearances are that Boliver isn't a very common name,
and indeed I find only one person with that name anywhere. And
in 1910 he's there on roll 531, page 40 of the Census.
Adjacent to the entry for his family is his mother Caroline,
now age 80 and widowed. (She preceded Boliver on the 1900
Census page, age 70 and widowed.) The census taker is a little
dyslexic, to be sure, as lots of names don't look right on
this page, including wife Viola who's now Eolia V. See also
Persey above, who was Percy E. in the 1900 Census. But the
kids...! It looks like Boliver has traded them in. We've got
Hermon L. age 18, Dallas C. age 17, Charles A. age 14,
daughter Doney C. age 10, and a fifth kid now, Zula M. age 4.
Any ideas what gives here?
WEll, It's like that one of the census takers got the names wrong
(since all the kids seem to be there on the second one, and are
the correct ages). The enumerators didn't always speak to the
actual households involved - if they weren't at home, a neighbor
might have supplied the information. If they didn't know the
family too well, names and ages are frequently off.
OR the enumerator didn't understand the name given, and
interpreted what they thought they heard. My great-great
grandmother was named "Transylvania." One census lists her as
"Frances Sylvia."
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html
"Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support
group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the
bar." - Drew Carey
-
Hugh Watkins
Re: Traded in the kids?
Christopher Jahn wrote:
sometimes the data is there but on the wrong line
have you looked at the images?
Hugh W
--
new phone = new daily blog
http://upsrev622.blogspot.com/
family history
http://hughw36.blogspot.com
clifto <clifto@gmail.com> wrote in
news:lbimv3-l7g.ln1@remote.clifto.com:
So in 1900 we find Boliver Sharp in St. Tammany Parish, LA.
He's 36, married 8 years with four kids; Samuel is 7, David is
5, Joseph is 3 and Alice is 1. Wife Viola is 34. (Roll 583,
second page 33 of the Census.)
Now, appearances are that Boliver isn't a very common name,
and indeed I find only one person with that name anywhere. And
in 1910 he's there on roll 531, page 40 of the Census.
Adjacent to the entry for his family is his mother Caroline,
now age 80 and widowed. (She preceded Boliver on the 1900
Census page, age 70 and widowed.) The census taker is a little
dyslexic, to be sure, as lots of names don't look right on
this page, including wife Viola who's now Eolia V. See also
Persey above, who was Percy E. in the 1900 Census. But the
kids...! It looks like Boliver has traded them in. We've got
Hermon L. age 18, Dallas C. age 17, Charles A. age 14,
daughter Doney C. age 10, and a fifth kid now, Zula M. age 4.
Any ideas what gives here?
WEll, It's like that one of the census takers got the names wrong
(since all the kids seem to be there on the second one, and are
the correct ages). The enumerators didn't always speak to the
actual households involved - if they weren't at home, a neighbor
might have supplied the information. If they didn't know the
family too well, names and ages are frequently off.
OR the enumerator didn't understand the name given, and
interpreted what they thought they heard. My great-great
grandmother was named "Transylvania." One census lists her as
"Frances Sylvia."
if the pages were copied column by column
sometimes the data is there but on the wrong line
have you looked at the images?
Hugh W
--
new phone = new daily blog
http://upsrev622.blogspot.com/
family history
http://hughw36.blogspot.com
-
Janette McLennan
Re: Traded in the kids?
I am not sure what is happening, but if you come up with a solution let me
know. My ggg grandfather was listed on one census as Kirkbride S Countryman
(1850) but John S Countryman from 1860 census on!
Janette
know. My ggg grandfather was listed on one census as Kirkbride S Countryman
(1850) but John S Countryman from 1860 census on!
Janette
-
Christopher Jahn
Re: Traded in the kids?
"Janette McLennan" <JaMc@bigpond.com> wrote in
news:xIfYg.47286$rP1.4474@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
You need to look for them both until you clear it up. Like I
said, the census taker doesn't always talk directly to the people
they count. A neighbor could have confused the names, or they
may not have and there's something new to research.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html
A harp is a nude piano.
news:xIfYg.47286$rP1.4474@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
I am not sure what is happening, but if you come up with a
solution let me know. My ggg grandfather was listed on one
census as Kirkbride S Countryman (1850) but John S Countryman
from 1860 census on! Janette
You need to look for them both until you clear it up. Like I
said, the census taker doesn't always talk directly to the people
they count. A neighbor could have confused the names, or they
may not have and there's something new to research.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html
A harp is a nude piano.
-
clifto
Re: Traded in the kids?
Janette McLennan wrote:
Several people I've found go by a first name in one census and a middle
name in another. Don't discount the possibility of multiple middle names.
Some nicknames have come up in my research, too.
--
More abuse of eminent domain!
http://www.villagelandgrab.com/
I am not sure what is happening, but if you come up with a solution let me
know. My ggg grandfather was listed on one census as Kirkbride S Countryman
(1850) but John S Countryman from 1860 census on!
Several people I've found go by a first name in one census and a middle
name in another. Don't discount the possibility of multiple middle names.
Some nicknames have come up in my research, too.
--
More abuse of eminent domain!
http://www.villagelandgrab.com/