1850 on ancestry

Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper

Svar
singhals

1850 on ancestry

Legg inn av singhals » 31 jan 2005 04:07:31

Is the index at Ancestry for the 1850 an every-name or just a HoH?

Bruce Remick

Re: 1850 on ancestry

Legg inn av Bruce Remick » 31 jan 2005 04:41:54

"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:5bqdnUNcJ4FvPWDcRVn-gw@rcn.net...
Is the index at Ancestry for the 1850 an every-name or just a HoH?


Every name.

Bruce

singhals

Re: 1850 on ancestry

Legg inn av singhals » 31 jan 2005 22:11:54

Bruce Remick wrote:

"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:5bqdnUNcJ4FvPWDcRVn-gw@rcn.net...

Is the index at Ancestry for the 1850 an every-name or just a HoH?



Every name.

Bruce



Thanks.

Cheryl

Bruce Remick

Re: 1850 on ancestry

Legg inn av Bruce Remick » 01 feb 2005 02:41:16

"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:TuidndZ86v-GAmPcRVn-3w@rcn.net...
Bruce Remick wrote:

"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:5bqdnUNcJ4FvPWDcRVn-gw@rcn.net...

Is the index at Ancestry for the 1850 an every-name or just a HoH?



Every name.

Bruce



Thanks.

Cheryl

Or should I say, every name except the person you're looking for. That's
what I run into more often than not.

Bruce

singhals

Re: 1850 on ancestry

Legg inn av singhals » 01 feb 2005 15:31:40

Bruce Remick wrote:
"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:TuidndZ86v-GAmPcRVn-3w@rcn.net...

Bruce Remick wrote:


"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:5bqdnUNcJ4FvPWDcRVn-gw@rcn.net...


Is the index at Ancestry for the 1850 an every-name or just a HoH?



Every name.

Bruce



Thanks.

Cheryl


Or should I say, every name except the person you're looking for. That's
what I run into more often than not.

Bruce



(G) I heard that! People show up under names you didn't know they had.

Or, from one of my searches last night out of 9 names -- I couldn't
find the husband, any of the sons, and only 1 of the sons-in-law but
before he married into the family so I can't be 100% that it's him.

Cheryl

Svar

Gå tilbake til «alt.genealogy»