Question --- In the "Civil War Service Records" listing each soldier there
has
6 titles, i.e., Name, Company, Unit, Rank - Induction, Rank - Discharge,
and Allegiance. However, periodically there is a "Notes" title. Can anyone
tell
me where this information comes from. I have a name -- John A. Hummel, but,
in the Notes it indicates "Hummell John H" What meaning would that
typically
have?
Regards...Bob
--
______________
lvMMMCDLXXIX+1
Ancestry.com Civil War Record question
Moderator: MOD_nyhetsgrupper
-
singhals
Re: Ancestry.com Civil War Record question
Bob Rasmussen wrote:
If Ancestry took their data off the Civil War Soldiers and Sailors
System, the info comes from the CSR card.
On the data-entry procedure NOTES was used for aliases or other
alternate information.
If Ancestry didn't just link to the CWSSS, it still looks like an alias
.... It's not difficult to write a cursive H so it looks like an A.
Cheryl
Question --- In the "Civil War Service Records" listing each soldier there
has
6 titles, i.e., Name, Company, Unit, Rank - Induction, Rank - Discharge,
and Allegiance. However, periodically there is a "Notes" title. Can anyone
tell
me where this information comes from. I have a name -- John A. Hummel, but,
in the Notes it indicates "Hummell John H" What meaning would that
typically
have?
If Ancestry took their data off the Civil War Soldiers and Sailors
System, the info comes from the CSR card.
On the data-entry procedure NOTES was used for aliases or other
alternate information.
If Ancestry didn't just link to the CWSSS, it still looks like an alias
.... It's not difficult to write a cursive H so it looks like an A.
Cheryl
-
Bob Rasmussen
Re: Ancestry.com Civil War Record question
Thanks, Cheryl...
Having said that, would you say that the correct name is the one
that appears as Name: John A. Hummel or the Notes name
John H. Hummell? Company E, 28th Pennsylvania Inf. shows
John H. Hummel (no second 'l') as a soldier. What would you
conclude? Full Entry....
Name: John A. Hummel
Company: E
Unit: 28 Pennsylvania Info.
Rank-I: Private
Rank-D: Private
Allegiance: Union
Notes: Hummell John H
Regards...Bob
--
______________
lvMMMCDLXXIX+1
"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:cqCdnT66XoKJmifcRVn-ug@rcn.net...
Having said that, would you say that the correct name is the one
that appears as Name: John A. Hummel or the Notes name
John H. Hummell? Company E, 28th Pennsylvania Inf. shows
John H. Hummel (no second 'l') as a soldier. What would you
conclude? Full Entry....
Name: John A. Hummel
Company: E
Unit: 28 Pennsylvania Info.
Rank-I: Private
Rank-D: Private
Allegiance: Union
Notes: Hummell John H
Regards...Bob
--
______________
lvMMMCDLXXIX+1
"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:cqCdnT66XoKJmifcRVn-ug@rcn.net...
Bob Rasmussen wrote:
Question --- In the "Civil War Service Records" listing each soldier
there
has
6 titles, i.e., Name, Company, Unit, Rank - Induction, Rank - Discharge,
and Allegiance. However, periodically there is a "Notes" title. Can
anyone
tell
me where this information comes from. I have a name -- John A. Hummel,
but,
in the Notes it indicates "Hummell John H" What meaning would that
typically
have?
If Ancestry took their data off the Civil War Soldiers and Sailors
System, the info comes from the CSR card.
On the data-entry procedure NOTES was used for aliases or other
alternate information.
If Ancestry didn't just link to the CWSSS, it still looks like an alias
... It's not difficult to write a cursive H so it looks like an A.
Cheryl
-
singhals
Re: Ancestry.com Civil War Record question
Bob Rasmussen wrote:
Lacking further info on either of them, it's hard to say. But one l
more or less isn't a big deal, and as I say, I've seen and written a lot
of H that look more like A. If they were both in the same unit and
you've no good reason to suspect there were two of 'em, ...?
Data entry worked from copies from the microfilm; quality wasn't great
and we were told to enter as much as we could read and the file-matching
would catch those we couldn't.
Cheryl
Thanks, Cheryl...
Having said that, would you say that the correct name is the one
that appears as Name: John A. Hummel or the Notes name
John H. Hummell? Company E, 28th Pennsylvania Inf. shows
John H. Hummel (no second 'l') as a soldier. What would you
conclude? Full Entry....
Name: John A. Hummel
Company: E
Unit: 28 Pennsylvania Info.
Rank-I: Private
Rank-D: Private
Allegiance: Union
Notes: Hummell John H
Regards...Bob
Lacking further info on either of them, it's hard to say. But one l
more or less isn't a big deal, and as I say, I've seen and written a lot
of H that look more like A. If they were both in the same unit and
you've no good reason to suspect there were two of 'em, ...?
Data entry worked from copies from the microfilm; quality wasn't great
and we were told to enter as much as we could read and the file-matching
would catch those we couldn't.
Cheryl
-
Bob Rasmussen
Re: Ancestry.com Civil War Record question
Thanks, Cheryl...was hoping to find a John Albert Hummel(l). All I
knew was that he was possibly in the Civil War and probably signed
up in Phila. Unfortunately, there are lots of John Hummels from PA
and don't have any further information to narrow him down. There
was indeed a John H. Hummel in Company E, 28 Pennsylvania Inf.,
but, no John A. Hummel. Will keep trying to match him up.
Thanks for the help...Bob
--
______________
lvMMMCDLXXIX+1
"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:ip6dnT041KJH-yfcRVn-3Q@rcn.net...
knew was that he was possibly in the Civil War and probably signed
up in Phila. Unfortunately, there are lots of John Hummels from PA
and don't have any further information to narrow him down. There
was indeed a John H. Hummel in Company E, 28 Pennsylvania Inf.,
but, no John A. Hummel. Will keep trying to match him up.
Thanks for the help...Bob
--
______________
lvMMMCDLXXIX+1
"singhals" <singhals@erols.com> wrote in message
news:ip6dnT041KJH-yfcRVn-3Q@rcn.net...
Bob Rasmussen wrote:
Thanks, Cheryl...
Having said that, would you say that the correct name is the one
that appears as Name: John A. Hummel or the Notes name
John H. Hummell? Company E, 28th Pennsylvania Inf. shows
John H. Hummel (no second 'l') as a soldier. What would you
conclude? Full Entry....
Name: John A. Hummel
Company: E
Unit: 28 Pennsylvania Info.
Rank-I: Private
Rank-D: Private
Allegiance: Union
Notes: Hummell John H
Regards...Bob
Lacking further info on either of them, it's hard to say. But one l
more or less isn't a big deal, and as I say, I've seen and written a lot
of H that look more like A. If they were both in the same unit and
you've no good reason to suspect there were two of 'em, ...?
Data entry worked from copies from the microfilm; quality wasn't great
and we were told to enter as much as we could read and the file-matching
would catch those we couldn't.
Cheryl